From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jitendra Kumar Khasdev <jkhasdev@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, linus.luessing@c0d3.bluen,
hannes@stressinduktion.org, willemb@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jitendra Kumar Khasdev <jitendra.khasdev@hotwaxsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: net: core: skbuff.c: Added do-while pair for complex macros
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:00:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448557223.18647.4.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448555763-5088-1-git-send-email-jitendra.khasdev@hotwaxsystems.com>
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:06 +0530, Jitendra Kumar Khasdev wrote:
> This patch is to file skbuff.c that fixes up following error,
> reported by checkpatch.pl tool,
Your subject title is not correct.
This is not a staging patch.
> 1. ERROR: Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed
> in a do - while loop.
checkpatch is brainless.
Not every message it emits needs fixing.
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
[]
> @@ -748,11 +748,13 @@ void consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(consume_skb);
>
> /* Make sure a field is enclosed inside headers_start/headers_end section */
> -#define CHECK_SKB_FIELD(field) \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) < \
> - offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_start)); \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) > \
> - offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_end)); \
> +#define CHECK_SKB_FIELD(field) \
> + do { \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) < \
> + offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_start)); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) > \
> + offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_end)); \
> + } while (0) \
Perhaps the last check should add a sizeof(field)
BUILD_BUG_ON((offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) +
FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, field)) >
offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_end));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 16:36 [PATCH] staging: net: core: skbuff.c: Added do-while pair for complex macros Jitendra Kumar Khasdev
2015-11-26 17:00 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2015-11-26 21:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448557223.18647.4.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jitendra.khasdev@hotwaxsystems.com \
--cc=jkhasdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.luessing@c0d3.bluen \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.