All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1448613238.2531.12.camel@sipsolutions.net>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index f383194..e770107 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 19:27 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
 
-> ?#define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN	NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
+>  #define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN	NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
 > diff --git a/net/wireless/chan.c b/net/wireless/chan.c
 > index 59cabc9..b1ab77a 100644
 > --- a/net/wireless/chan.c
 > +++ b/net/wireless/chan.c
 > @@ -804,7 +804,8 @@ static bool _cfg80211_reg_can_beacon(struct wiphy
 > *wiphy,
-> ?{
-> ?	bool res;
-> ?	u32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |
-> -			???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;
-> +			???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
-> +			???????IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;
+>  {
+>  	bool res;
+>  	u32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |
+> -			       IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;
+> +			       IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
+> +			       IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;
 
 So ... for the kernel, I don't *like* this approach, because it
 requires touching every single driver, and every single person who
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 75e6a25..598ef5a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,26 +1,34 @@
  "ref\01448303241-27747-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz\0"
  "ref\01448303241-27747-6-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz\0"
  "From\0Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>\0"
- "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 5/8] cfg80211: Add support for OCB-only channels\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] cfg80211: Add support for OCB-only channels\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:33:58 +0100\0"
- "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0"
+ "To\0Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>"
+ " linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "Cc\0bernd.lehmann@volkswagen.de"
+  s.sander@nordsys.de
+  wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org
+  ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
+  ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com
+ " Jan Kaisrl\303\255k <kaisrja1@fel.cvut.cz>"
+ " Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 19:27 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:\n"
  "\n"
- "> ?#define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN\tNL80211_RRF_NO_IR\n"
+ "> \302\240#define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN\tNL80211_RRF_NO_IR\n"
  "> diff --git a/net/wireless/chan.c b/net/wireless/chan.c\n"
  "> index 59cabc9..b1ab77a 100644\n"
  "> --- a/net/wireless/chan.c\n"
  "> +++ b/net/wireless/chan.c\n"
  "> @@ -804,7 +804,8 @@ static bool _cfg80211_reg_can_beacon(struct wiphy\n"
  "> *wiphy,\n"
- "> ?{\n"
- "> ?\tbool res;\n"
- "> ?\tu32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |\n"
- "> -\t\t\t???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;\n"
- "> +\t\t\t???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |\n"
- "> +\t\t\t???????IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;\n"
+ "> \302\240{\n"
+ "> \302\240\tbool res;\n"
+ "> \302\240\tu32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |\n"
+ "> -\t\t\t\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;\n"
  "\n"
  "So ... for the kernel, I don't *like* this approach, because it\n"
  "requires touching every single driver, and every single person who\n"
@@ -59,4 +67,4 @@
  "\n"
  johannes
 
-f63ee51be6160086377e148662e00fe445149626f34058a9c79728eeef821153
+ee908e032dacbbf1c7b624e47ae185a2dce245d0b7c5b14e119e41e008693ac2

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index f383194..4480174 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 19:27 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
 
-> ?#define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN	NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
+>  #define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN	NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
 > diff --git a/net/wireless/chan.c b/net/wireless/chan.c
 > index 59cabc9..b1ab77a 100644
 > --- a/net/wireless/chan.c
 > +++ b/net/wireless/chan.c
 > @@ -804,7 +804,8 @@ static bool _cfg80211_reg_can_beacon(struct wiphy
 > *wiphy,
-> ?{
-> ?	bool res;
-> ?	u32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |
-> -			???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;
-> +			???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
-> +			???????IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;
+>  {
+>  	bool res;
+>  	u32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |
+> -			       IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;
+> +			       IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
+> +			       IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;
 
 So ... for the kernel, I don't *like* this approach, because it
 requires touching every single driver, and every single person who
@@ -50,3 +50,8 @@ working since it would just see disabled channels while ignoring the
 OCB flag.
 
 johannes
+
+_______________________________________________
+wireless-regdb mailing list
+wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 75e6a25..e9f319d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -1,26 +1,34 @@
  "ref\01448303241-27747-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz\0"
  "ref\01448303241-27747-6-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz\0"
  "From\0Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>\0"
- "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 5/8] cfg80211: Add support for OCB-only channels\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH v2 5/8] cfg80211: Add support for OCB-only channels\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:33:58 +0100\0"
- "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0"
+ "To\0Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>"
+ " linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "Cc\0Jan Kaisrl\303\255k <kaisrja1@fel.cvut.cz>"
+  wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org
+  Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
+  ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com
+  ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
+  bernd.lehmann@volkswagen.de
+ " s.sander@nordsys.de\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 19:27 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:\n"
  "\n"
- "> ?#define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN\tNL80211_RRF_NO_IR\n"
+ "> \302\240#define NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN\tNL80211_RRF_NO_IR\n"
  "> diff --git a/net/wireless/chan.c b/net/wireless/chan.c\n"
  "> index 59cabc9..b1ab77a 100644\n"
  "> --- a/net/wireless/chan.c\n"
  "> +++ b/net/wireless/chan.c\n"
  "> @@ -804,7 +804,8 @@ static bool _cfg80211_reg_can_beacon(struct wiphy\n"
  "> *wiphy,\n"
- "> ?{\n"
- "> ?\tbool res;\n"
- "> ?\tu32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |\n"
- "> -\t\t\t???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;\n"
- "> +\t\t\t???????IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |\n"
- "> +\t\t\t???????IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;\n"
+ "> \302\240{\n"
+ "> \302\240\tbool res;\n"
+ "> \302\240\tu32 prohibited_flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED |\n"
+ "> -\t\t\t\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR;\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |\n"
+ "> +\t\t\t\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240IEEE80211_CHAN_OCB_ONLY;\n"
  "\n"
  "So ... for the kernel, I don't *like* this approach, because it\n"
  "requires touching every single driver, and every single person who\n"
@@ -57,6 +65,11 @@
  "working since it would just see disabled channels while ignoring the\n"
  "OCB flag.\n"
  "\n"
- johannes
+ "johannes\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "wireless-regdb mailing list\n"
+ "wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
 
-f63ee51be6160086377e148662e00fe445149626f34058a9c79728eeef821153
+c64ba975fdeb61c1c25086e0b481b34aa6d2ec1463768ffe1cab649659bfcfad

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.