All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1449033191.3041.11.camel@hasee>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e516921..5404ab7 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
 > > What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme?
 > 
 > What would be the advantage over virtio-blk?  Multiqueue is not supported
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 1d7bad6..4bfe09a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,12 +6,18 @@
  "ref\0565DC48B.6030903@redhat.com\0"
  "ref\01448987171.3041.2.camel@hasee\0"
  "ref\0998355860.30506151.1448989146641.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com\0"
- "From\0mlin@kernel.org (Ming Lin)\0"
- "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0"
+ "From\0Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:13:11 -0800\0"
+ "To\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0qemu-devel@nongnu.org"
+  Rob Nelson <rlnelson@google.com>
+  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+  linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
+ " virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n"
+ "On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n"
  "> > What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme?\n"
  "> \n"
  "> What would be the advantage over virtio-blk?  Multiqueue is not supported\n"
@@ -44,4 +50,4 @@
  "\n"
  Thanks.
 
-fefba14ab4864e994f17d5cc6c4d7892e0fe3fef37c2ab5235908515bb033b75
+2c3d463a8a0285bbce90463dffd4feab4c5e784b7dd4941fd9ae6169ac6d1616

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index e516921..5404ab7 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
 > > What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme?
 > 
 > What would be the advantage over virtio-blk?  Multiqueue is not supported
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 1d7bad6..8c7a616 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -6,12 +6,18 @@
  "ref\0565DC48B.6030903@redhat.com\0"
  "ref\01448987171.3041.2.camel@hasee\0"
  "ref\0998355860.30506151.1448989146641.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com\0"
- "From\0mlin@kernel.org (Ming Lin)\0"
- "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0"
+ "From\0Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:13:11 -0800\0"
+ "To\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0qemu-devel@nongnu.org"
+  Rob Nelson <rlnelson@google.com>
+  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+  linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
+ " virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n"
+ "On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n"
  "> > What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme?\n"
  "> \n"
  "> What would be the advantage over virtio-blk?  Multiqueue is not supported\n"
@@ -44,4 +50,4 @@
  "\n"
  Thanks.
 
-fefba14ab4864e994f17d5cc6c4d7892e0fe3fef37c2ab5235908515bb033b75
+a205bcd0c17a64bd8c3927b7ad1b32778e54dfaa86677b722e2d4ae05a6a0f29

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.