From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCHv6] 00/28] Kconfig conversion Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:50:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1449136204.4424.117.camel@citrix.com> References: <1448387538-12208-1-git-send-email-cardoe@cardoe.com> <565FB0C1.8010101@cardoe.com> <56600B7102000078000BB8C0@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56600B7102000078000BB8C0@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Keir Fraser , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Tim Deegan , Wei Liu , Doug Goldstein List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 01:29 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 03.12.15 at 04:02, wrote: > > There's been quite a few comments on this series and I'll admit I'm a > > bit lost as to the requested direction for the series so just to clear > > things up I'm going to send this out and address all the items before > > the next repost. My goal is to save you all time as reviewers so that > > hopefully you'll only have to review one more series. > > My views (already incorporating changes thereto due to feedback > from others): I agree with your answers, except... > > 1. Remove the KEXEC patch from this series and add it to the follow-on > > series? > > I don't mind it being in the initial series. All I do mind is it being done > in two pieces. ... I don't follow the "in two pieces" bit, I suppose Doug will know what that is about, but I neither agree nor disagree since I've no idea what it means. Ian.