From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6] 00/28] Kconfig conversion
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 11:10:17 +0000
Message-ID: <1449141017.4424.120.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1448387538-12208-1-git-send-email-cardoe@cardoe.com>
	<565FB0C1.8010101@cardoe.com>
	<56600B7102000078000BB8C0@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
	<1449136204.4424.117.camel@citrix.com>
	<56602EF902000078000BBA6F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <56602EF902000078000BBA6F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 04:00 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 03.12.15 at 10:50, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 01:29 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 03.12.15 at 04:02, <cardoe@cardoe.com> wrote:
> > > > 1. Remove the KEXEC patch from this series and add it to the
> > > > follow-on
> > > > series?
> > > 
> > > I don't mind it being in the initial series. All I do mind is it
> > > being done
> > > in two pieces.
> > 
> > ... I don't follow the "in two pieces" bit, I suppose Doug will know
> > what
> > that is about, but I neither agree nor disagree since I've no idea what
> > it
> > means.
> 
> This referred to patch 15 converting HAS_KEXEC and patch 28
> introducing CONFIG_KEXEC.

Ah, ok. I have no opinion on that split.

Ian.