From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 20:03:04 +0000
Subject: Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm
Message-Id: <1449172984.12092.0.camel@perches.com>
List-Id: <linux-sctp.vger.kernel.org>
References: <CACT4Y+ZnWRZfQC25uW=GXHAJB=GX0L6tJQUy43P6WNR3=hwT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20151203130525.GB4164@mrl.redhat.com>
	 <CACT4Y+ZMshfGvb81VhCGuZzbSec2sCBaJUNFb1QQ-ccyH9BPkQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CANn89iKEv-q6EFi1eX+Hk_2+jNfZ0ayUqUn_Fh1U7RTs9xjdXg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CACT4Y+bgeqS05zqkAHkxzAP7fuvFSkeEybwDTizw6Gp8KK28Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CANn89i+d=mTJ-hAhhgPXsZPGAkQdECxRdbkeRLfozRq8i9Ms+g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CACT4Y+YJe-OJj9q1Kr5-_ApDt1UBKLjTRxhP62EHtEAwZt5vXw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f7twpsvgyar.fsf@aconole.bos.csb> <566098BD.6010803@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <566098BD.6010803@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>, Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>

On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted,
> > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test):
[]
> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It
> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would
> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic
> 'really_no_printk()' macro.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: use-after-free in sctp_do_sm
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:03:04 -0800
Message-ID: <1449172984.12092.0.camel@perches.com>
References: <CACT4Y+ZnWRZfQC25uW=GXHAJB=GX0L6tJQUy43P6WNR3=hwT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20151203130525.GB4164@mrl.redhat.com>
	 <CACT4Y+ZMshfGvb81VhCGuZzbSec2sCBaJUNFb1QQ-ccyH9BPkQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CANn89iKEv-q6EFi1eX+Hk_2+jNfZ0ayUqUn_Fh1U7RTs9xjdXg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CACT4Y+bgeqS05zqkAHkxzAP7fuvFSkeEybwDTizw6Gp8KK28Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CANn89i+d=mTJ-hAhhgPXsZPGAkQdECxRdbkeRLfozRq8i9Ms+g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CACT4Y+YJe-OJj9q1Kr5-_ApDt1UBKLjTRxhP62EHtEAwZt5vXw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f7twpsvgyar.fsf@aconole.bos.csb> <566098BD.6010803@akamai.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
	Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtprelay0159.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.159]:35176 "EHLO
	smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753285AbbLCUDI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:03:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <566098BD.6010803@akamai.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:32 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 01:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> > I think that as a minimum, the following patch should be evaluted,
> > but am unsure to whom I should submit it (after I test):
[]
> Agreed - the intention here is certainly to have no side effects. It
> looks like 'no_printk()' is used in quite a few other places that would
> benefit from this change. So we probably want a generic
> 'really_no_printk()' macro.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/17/231