Re: [PATCH v2] xen: sched: fix (ACPI S3) resume with cpupools with different schedulers.

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1187 bytes --]

On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 12:21 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 24/11/15 17:14, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:32 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > 
> > As said, I don't recall all the details, sorry. I recall thinking
> > that
> > a solution would involve putting the CPU in the pool earlier, but
> > that
> > in turn calls for other work (e.g., tweaking the priorities of the
> > callbacks for avoiding races).
> > 
> > It's on my list of things to do, but not with super high priority.
> > Are
> > you saying that we should drop this patch, and do the callback
> > reordering/refactoring first?
> 
> Sorry, meant to respond to this -- no, I don't think refactoring is a
> prerequisite.  
>
Ah, okay. :-)

> Let me give it another look-over today.
> 
That would be much appreciated. Not a super huge deal, but I've got a
few patches stacked on top of this...

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel