From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dvyukov@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "bpf, array: fix heap out-of-bounds access when updating elements" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:48:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449852520177240@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bpf, array: fix heap out-of-bounds access when updating elements
to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bpf-array-fix-heap-out-of-bounds-access-when-updating-elements.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Fri Dec 11 11:39:13 EST 2015
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:02:56 +0100
Subject: bpf, array: fix heap out-of-bounds access when updating elements
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
[ Upstream commit fbca9d2d35c6ef1b323fae75cc9545005ba25097 ]
During own review but also reported by Dmitry's syzkaller [1] it has been
noticed that we trigger a heap out-of-bounds access on eBPF array maps
when updating elements. This happens with each map whose map->value_size
(specified during map creation time) is not multiple of 8 bytes.
In array_map_alloc(), elem_size is round_up(attr->value_size, 8) and
used to align array map slots for faster access. However, in function
array_map_update_elem(), we update the element as ...
memcpy(array->value + array->elem_size * index, value, array->elem_size);
... where we access 'value' out-of-bounds, since it was allocated from
map_update_elem() from syscall side as kmalloc(map->value_size, GFP_USER)
and later on copied through copy_from_user(value, uvalue, map->value_size).
Thus, up to 7 bytes, we can access out-of-bounds.
Same could happen from within an eBPF program, where in worst case we
access beyond an eBPF program's designated stack.
Since 1be7f75d1668 ("bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs") didn't hit an
official release yet, it only affects priviledged users.
In case of array_map_lookup_elem(), the verifier prevents eBPF programs
from accessing beyond map->value_size through check_map_access(). Also
from syscall side map_lookup_elem() only copies map->value_size back to
user, so nothing could leak.
[1] http://github.com/google/syzkaller
Fixes: 28fbcfa08d8e ("bpf: add array type of eBPF maps")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int array_map_update_elem(struct
/* all elements already exist */
return -EEXIST;
- memcpy(array->value + array->elem_size * index, value, array->elem_size);
+ memcpy(array->value + array->elem_size * index, value, map->value_size);
return 0;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@iogearbox.net are
queue-4.1/packet-infer-protocol-from-ethernet-header-if-unset.patch
queue-4.1/bpf-array-fix-heap-out-of-bounds-access-when-updating-elements.patch
queue-4.1/ipv6-sctp-implement-sctp_v6_destroy_sock.patch
queue-4.1/packet-only-allow-extra-vlan-len-on-ethernet-devices.patch
queue-4.1/net-scm-fix-pax-detected-msg_controllen-overflow-in-scm_detach_fds.patch
queue-4.1/packet-fix-tpacket_snd-max-frame-len.patch
queue-4.1/packet-always-probe-for-transport-header.patch
queue-4.1/packet-do-skb_probe_transport_header-when-we-actually-have-data.patch
queue-4.1/tools-net-use-include-uapi-with-__exported_headers__.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-12-11 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449852520177240@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.