From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yu.c.chen@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
lv.zheng@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:43:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145039220713055@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events
to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
acpi-using-correct-irq-when-waiting-for-events.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From efb1cf7d28b8aeacec53e9ba8f3f2809c5cb9686 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:02:36 +0800
Subject: ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
commit efb1cf7d28b8aeacec53e9ba8f3f2809c5cb9686 upstream.
When the system is waiting for GPE/fixed event handler to finish,
it uses acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt directly as the IRQ number.
However, the remapped IRQ returned by acpi_gsi_to_irq() should be
passed to synchronize_hardirq() instead of it.
Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -1183,8 +1183,8 @@ void acpi_os_wait_events_complete(void)
* Make sure the GPE handler or the fixed event handler is not used
* on another CPU after removal.
*/
- if (acpi_irq_handler)
- synchronize_hardirq(acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt);
+ if (acpi_sci_irq_valid())
+ synchronize_hardirq(acpi_sci_irq);
flush_workqueue(kacpid_wq);
flush_workqueue(kacpi_notify_wq);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from yu.c.chen@intel.com are
queue-4.3/acpi-using-correct-irq-when-waiting-for-events.patch
queue-4.3/acpi-pm-fix-incorrect-wakeup-irq-setting-during-suspend-to-idle.patch
queue-4.3/acpi-use-correct-irq-when-uninstalling-acpi-interrupt-handler.patch
reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145039220713055@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.