From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: sensor-hub: Add quirk for Lenovo Yoga 900 with ITE
 Chips
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:29:02 -0800
Message-ID: <1450546142.4225.15.camel@linux.intel.com>
References: <1450463680-10400-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
	 <CAOhV88P35k37uP1=qhsThgrA4Y7iOn6fARps-N6DxaSpzKkztA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAOhV88NiqWR6VvuRakQKNUT-Vv87NnA52qEhz_1YS7xyKjkggA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:41804 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S933337AbbLSRay (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-input@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:30:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAOhV88NiqWR6VvuRakQKNUT-Vv87NnA52qEhz_1YS7xyKjkggA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
To: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, linux-input@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 09:21 -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Nish Aravamudan
> <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada
> > <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > This needs same quirk as applied to other YOGA sensor hubs.
> > > Refer to
> > > 47eeca8a48 (" HID: sensor-hub: Add in quirk for Lenovo Yogas with
> > > ITE")
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
> > > srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Ok, maybe I spoke too soon! It did work once, at least. But since
> > then
> > it seems to have stopped working again? That is, the *raw* files
> > are
> > still working, but iio-sensor-proxy is again not seeing any updates
> > via the chardev(s). Any notion of what might be going on?
> > 
> > Note that dmesg does contain (it always has):
> > 
> > i2c_hid i2c-ITE8396:00: error in i2c_hid_init_report size:19 /
> > ret_size:18
> > 
> > but I have no idea if that's relevant to the IIO sensors? I was
> > told
> > in another thread that it shouldn't have any negative consequence.
> 
> Very strrange! After resuming from suspend this morning to check my
> e-mail, it worked again! So maybe there is some bug/race still in the
> init/suspend/resume path?

As suggested in my previous post, If you want, you can debug i2c hid
messages to root causes.

> 
> -Nish