From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:17:02 -0800 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH V5] ixgbe: synchronize link_up and link_speed of a slave In-Reply-To: <1451538295-15823-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> References: <7EED4F91-2DE5-407F-BA6A-681ED57650E4@intel.com> <1451538295-15823-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1451539022.3348.95.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 13:04 +0800, zyjzyj2000 at gmail.com wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions from Rustad, Mark D. > According to his suggestions, the logs and source code are > simplified. I find it funny that this email (no patch) is got the correct subject, yet the updated patch you sent does not. ?The subject line for this email should have been used for the updated patch you sent out. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] ixgbe: synchronize link_up and link_speed of a slave Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:17:02 -0800 Message-ID: <1451539022.3348.95.camel@intel.com> References: <7EED4F91-2DE5-407F-BA6A-681ED57650E4@intel.com> <1451538295-15823-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-S4/7w8MXgNGmZHRenbjQ" Cc: venkat.viswanathan@windriver.com, Boris.Shteinbock@windriver.com, Vincent.Bourg@windriver.com To: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, shannon.nelson@intel.com, carolyn.wyborny@intel.com, donald.c.skidmore@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, mitch.a.williams@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mark.d.rustad@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:19650 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750857AbbLaFRO (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:17:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1451538295-15823-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-S4/7w8MXgNGmZHRenbjQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 13:04 +0800, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions from Rustad, Mark D. > According to his suggestions, the logs and source code are > simplified. I find it funny that this email (no patch) is got the correct subject, yet the updated patch you sent does not. =C2=A0The subject line for this email should have been used for the updated patch you sent out. --=-S4/7w8MXgNGmZHRenbjQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJWhLpOAAoJEOVv75VaS+3OdrMQAJgaBiF+icTdlgShZULiNPtq f5WUC3DFOOEvYlJNaeoL8OkKI7LwPaGFi4IAZ6Jbz+NwADz3T+XQBAFAFUBmBgKk iwpjJ7BTf4wY2yICmMhkTrB4b+QCNFvwrvJhSrWQst+Mbzjie82BZ5TOvcmrIi0b fgqjdFaEFtiAK3b+mXlG6dJwNSzwzI1MQUfbg3QbqmR0g8I3LqR0ws+IdUjYmbGt 3DdVHbWig4ipY15q/pMNSDsjjZcurbZtu4w44tveavmWdtnFBB3uI5W53t8Nw8dV ky3+EJPFkoBIWxrHcIxOoZa4/qnxJ1joZHWPA/T7SLNO5m46C524j5wrWYvSzxfP wGvv18rmkg5dn8SPvwjD8fsw37pNu0hzK8WncnSJ9goThqb71KMCUTD16behvyKv 6Z/YfECKZMKUpWI8PMoT4Ap7EjgpXysNDojOAlDK7hnFfrsXBTJ1C2s/F9fP6ZH/ aplwatYHngkYGWBYvmBg46VcdV5EON7zZrK36opm5E5uyTHdyiMvpXZnG8PN27s6 R2WqeI44FB2KtnWBI/BV5ogQlIuZi0rcqMTLdS5T0H7ypBwH+E/FGplC+R7PAMAn D8IinS4UVPJxObUhAHxjRuSUu0bBTL74CrPIevA7RgViA2twyV6UPc+mT1uuH7KI 9iTwzotJK1wlc2N26SSm =etru -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-S4/7w8MXgNGmZHRenbjQ--