From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] brcmfmac: change brcmf_sdio_wd_timer() prototype
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:05:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451988350-2197-4-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451988350-2197-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com>
The function brcmf_sdio_wd_timer() has wdtick parameter. However, it
is only called with two values and as such the parameter is replaced
with boolean value indicating the timer should be active or not.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky (Zhenhui) Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
---
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 33 ++++++++--------------
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
index ceb2a75..2f02020 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
@@ -503,8 +503,7 @@ struct brcmf_sdio {
struct timer_list timer;
struct completion watchdog_wait;
struct task_struct *watchdog_tsk;
- bool wd_timer_valid;
- uint save_ms;
+ bool wd_active;
struct workqueue_struct *brcmf_wq;
struct work_struct datawork;
@@ -961,7 +960,7 @@ end:
brcmf_sdio_clkctl(bus, CLK_NONE, pendok);
} else {
brcmf_sdio_clkctl(bus, CLK_AVAIL, pendok);
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, true);
}
bus->sleeping = sleep;
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "new state %s\n",
@@ -3576,7 +3575,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_bus_watchdog(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
if (bus->idlecount > bus->idletime) {
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "idle\n");
sdio_claim_host(bus->sdiodev->func[1]);
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, 0);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, false);
bus->idlecount = 0;
brcmf_sdio_bus_sleep(bus, true, false);
sdio_release_host(bus->sdiodev->func[1]);
@@ -3908,7 +3907,7 @@ brcmf_sdio_watchdog(unsigned long data)
if (bus->watchdog_tsk) {
complete(&bus->watchdog_wait);
/* Reschedule the watchdog */
- if (bus->wd_timer_valid)
+ if (bus->wd_active)
mod_timer(&bus->timer,
jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS));
}
@@ -3950,7 +3949,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_firmware_callback(struct device *dev,
/* Start the watchdog timer */
bus->sdcnt.tickcnt = 0;
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, true);
sdio_claim_host(sdiodev->func[1]);
@@ -4195,7 +4194,7 @@ void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
if (bus->ci) {
if (bus->sdiodev->state != BRCMF_SDIOD_NOMEDIUM) {
sdio_claim_host(bus->sdiodev->func[1]);
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, 0);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, false);
brcmf_sdio_clkctl(bus, CLK_AVAIL, false);
/* Leave the device in state where it is
* 'passive'. This is done by resetting all
@@ -4217,13 +4216,12 @@ void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "Disconnected\n");
}
-void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint wdtick)
+void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool active)
{
/* Totally stop the timer */
- if (!wdtick && bus->wd_timer_valid) {
+ if (!active && bus->wd_active) {
del_timer_sync(&bus->timer);
- bus->wd_timer_valid = false;
- bus->save_ms = wdtick;
+ bus->wd_active = false;
return;
}
@@ -4231,27 +4229,20 @@ void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint wdtick)
if (bus->sdiodev->state != BRCMF_SDIOD_DATA)
return;
- if (wdtick) {
- if (bus->save_ms != BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS) {
- if (bus->wd_timer_valid)
- /* Stop timer and restart at new value */
- del_timer_sync(&bus->timer);
-
+ if (active) {
+ if (!bus->wd_active) {
/* Create timer again when watchdog period is
dynamically changed or in the first instance
*/
bus->timer.expires =
jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
add_timer(&bus->timer);
-
+ bus->wd_active = true;
} else {
/* Re arm the timer, at last watchdog period */
mod_timer(&bus->timer,
jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS));
}
-
- bus->wd_timer_valid = true;
- bus->save_ms = wdtick;
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
index d86ecf2..ff47cee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ struct brcmf_sdio *brcmf_sdio_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
void brcmf_sdio_isr(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
-void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint wdtick);
+void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool active);
void brcmf_sdio_wowl_config(struct device *dev, bool enabled);
int brcmf_sdio_sleep(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool sleep);
void brcmf_sdio_trigger_dpc(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 10:05 [PATCH 0/6] brcmfmac: extend wowl and cleanup Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] brcmfmac: Add wowl net detect support Arend van Spriel
2016-01-08 8:45 ` [1/6] " Kalle Valo
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] brcmfmac: Reshuffle functions to avoid forward declarations Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] brcmfmac: use msecs_to_jiffies() in macro definitions Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] brcmfmac: use jiffies for timeout in btcoex Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] brcmfmac: Do not handle link downs for ibss Arend van Spriel
2016-01-07 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/6] brcmfmac: extend wowl and cleanup Arend van Spriel
2016-01-08 8:47 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1451988350-2197-4-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.