From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: vgic: Clarify some comments after 5d495f4 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:53:47 +0000 Message-ID: <1452005627.13361.301.camel@citrix.com> References: <1450373350-9085-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aGT1Q-0002K0-V5 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:55:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1450373350-9085-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 17:29 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Ian pointed out that the definition of "offset" and "appropriate > boundary" in the comments added by "xen/arm: vgic: Optimize the way to > store the target vCPU in the rank" were not cleared. > > Clarify them by explicitly mentionning the offset is in byte and the > appropriate boundary is ITARGET/IROUTER > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall Acked + applied, thanks.