All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] openvswitch: compute needed headroom for internal vports
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:43:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452501788.5027.13.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrHB_Bo2iqp2xGaZpOb2AvriGTTruC_O72hQ7LqKnkbR_CAeA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 18:44 -0800, pravin shelar wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Jesse Gross <jesse@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:53 PM, pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> Currently the ovs internal vports always use a default needed_headroom.
> >>> This leads to a skb head copy while xmitting on ovs swith via vport
> >>> that add some kind of encapsulation (gre, geneve, etc.).
> >>>
> >>> This patch add book-keeping for the maximum needed_headroom used by
> >>> the non internal vports in any dp, updating it on vport creation and
> >>> deletion.
> >>>
> >>> Said value is than used as needed_headroom for internal vports,
> >>> avoiding the above copy.
> >>>
> >> Why is this done only for internal devices? In most common case of
> >> traffic the packet enters OVS from tap or other netdev type vport
> >> device.
> >
> > How would you influence the allocation for non-internal devices?
> 
> Today there is no way of influencing this. But we could add new
> skb-headroom parameter to netdev for packets that are received on the
> device. This new parameter could be controlled from master devices
> like OVS, Bridge, etc. To set this value we need new ndo operation. So
> that it can work on devices like tap where it would just set this new
> value and in case of ovs-internal or veth device, it can also update
> needed_headroom.

My idea was to continue working along this lines.

However I thought to get there incrementally, i.e. handle internal
vports only first. Can this be ok for you?

Cheers,

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-11  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-08 21:50 [PATCH net] openvswitch: compute needed headroom for internal vports Paolo Abeni
2016-01-08 22:53 ` pravin shelar
2016-01-09  0:42   ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-09  2:44     ` pravin shelar
2016-01-11  8:43       ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2016-01-12  0:34         ` pravin shelar
2016-01-12 19:20           ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-12 20:44             ` pravin shelar
2016-01-13  1:08               ` Jesse Gross
2016-01-13  5:27                 ` pravin shelar
2016-01-13 17:30                   ` Paolo Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1452501788.5027.13.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fbl@sysclose.org \
    --cc=jesse@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pshelar@nicira.com \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.