From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>,
osstest-admin@xenproject.org
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:42:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452771751.2185.33.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569778BE02000078000C69D4@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 02:30 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 13.01.16 at 20:30, <osstest-admin@xenproject.org> wrote:
> > flight 77945 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/77945/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 5 xen-install
> > fail REGR. vs. 77892
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm 5 xen-install fail REGR.
> > vs. 77892
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 5 xen-install fail REGR.
> > vs. 77892
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 5 xen-install
> > fail REGR. vs. 77892
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 5 xen-install fail REGR.
> > vs. 77892
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 5 xen-install fail REGR.
> > vs. 77892
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 5 xen-install fail REGR.
> > vs. 77892
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 5 xen-install fail REGR.
> > vs. 77892
>
> All perhaps because of multiple instances of
>
> 2016-01-13 16:20:48 Z (skipping entry at 303..316; XSM policy file not
> present)
> 2016-01-13 16:20:48 Z (skipping entry at 317..330; XSM policy file not
> present)
>
> ? Are we having another ordering problem with the XSM/FLASK
> Kconfig-conversion patches?
The logs (at the bottom of the summary linked about) claim harness
revision fff2921dd931d92de43cde2f977b2c6ac3605966 which includes the
osstest side.
Looking at the build-amd64-xsm job
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/77945/build-amd64-xsm/info.html
I can see in the resulting tarballs that the policy is indeed missing and
that the build log (5.ts-xen-build.log) seems to not contain the bits which
build the policy (comparing with 77892's logs)
The bisector is working:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unstable/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.xen-install.html
and has gotten to this range:
$ git log --oneline 5513bd0b4675..20c8f1a8a5fd
20c8f1a convert XSM_ENABLE to Kconfig
529298f convert FLASK_ENABLE to Kconfig
361b4f9 build: save generated xen .config
e3cce17 x86/VPMU: implement ipc and arch filter flags
I suspect the issue is that 529298f removes FLASK_ENABLE from the top-
level, but that is used in tools/Makefile. i.e. there is that other patch
which needed to go before the two included above.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 19:30 [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-01-14 9:30 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 11:42 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-01-14 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 13:57 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 14:07 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 14:44 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 14:54 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 14:48 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 15:04 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 14:28 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] pass --{enable, disable}-xsmpolicy based on XSM state Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 14:58 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] enable FLASK_ENABLE when using it for testing Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 16:22 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 16:34 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 16:27 ` [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL [and 2 more messages] Ian Jackson
2016-01-14 17:07 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 17:18 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-14 17:25 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 19:10 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-15 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-15 17:06 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-15 17:10 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-15 17:15 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-15 17:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-15 17:42 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 7:49 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 8:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-18 9:41 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 9:47 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 11:22 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 11:28 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-18 11:36 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 12:09 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-15 17:21 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-16 20:54 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] enable FLASK_ENABLE when using it for testing Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 21:40 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] pass --{enable, disable}-xsmpolicy based on XSM state Doug Goldstein
2016-01-16 20:50 ` Doug Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452771751.2185.33.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.