From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aK4l7-0007Un-Ib for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:49:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aK4l4-0008Rf-CK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:49:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aK4l4-0008Rb-6s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:49:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1452865778.23156.80.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:49:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5697D217.1080907@redhat.com> References: <5697D217.1080907@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/51] qapi: qapi for audio backends List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?K=C5=91v=C3=A1g=C3=B3=2C_Zolt=C3=A1n?= Hi, > My pending patches will also allow an anonymous base class, so that we > don't have to specify an intermediate AudiodevCommonOptions class. Not > a show-stopper, though. >=20 > Overall looks rather sane (I think we've done the bulk of the reviewing > last summer), although I didn't read it closely enough for a R-b tag at > this time. Yes. I was basically waiting for the qapi patches to land first. Which took quite a bit longer than I expected. v8 posted in December ... So, what is the status and the plan here? I still would prefer to have the qapi bits go in first, then merge the audio work on top of this. But I also don't want wait forever, I'd like to see the audio bits finally land in qemu 2.6. cheers, Gerd