From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Patchwork <patchwork@annarchy.freedesktop.org>,
Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev8)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:38:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453196321.2828.6.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160118130132.2039.31368@annarchy.freedesktop.org>
Hi Shubhangi,
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 13:01 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
>
> HEAD is now at 2dd73be drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-18d-09h-59m-27s UTC
> integration manifest
> Applying: drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect
> Applying: drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse
> Applying: drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status
> Applying: drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it
> Applying: drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it and read
> sink_count dpcd always
It seems patchwork got confused about the order of the new patches in this
series. When you change multiple patches at once, it is common to resend the
entire series without --in-reply-to. It makes it easier for humans and patchwork
to figure out which are the new patches.
Can you please resend the series as a new thread so we can have the patches go
through CI run?
Thanks,
Ander
> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> M drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> M drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
> Auto-merging drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> Patch failed at 0005 drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it and
> read sink_count dpcd always
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 12:50 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 11:20 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-13 13:33 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-14 13:50 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-15 10:07 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:24 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 14:05 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 15:04 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:52 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 21:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-01-19 4:44 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 8:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19 8:59 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 9:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19 9:11 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 9:55 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorganizing intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:00 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:56 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: read sink_count dpcd always Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:04 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 12:44 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:46 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:49 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it and " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:36 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: force full detect on sink count change Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:50 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:40 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 13:49 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2016-01-18 10:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev6) Patchwork
2016-01-18 11:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev7) Patchwork
2016-01-18 13:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev8) Patchwork
2016-01-19 9:38 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
2016-01-19 10:22 ` Shrivastava, Shubhangi
2016-01-19 10:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev9) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453196321.2828.6.camel@gmail.com \
--to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=patchwork@annarchy.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.