From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:50:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1453211428.29930.44.camel@citrix.com> References: <1453142404-8819-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1453196796.6020.217.camel@citrix.com> <569E3C86.20407@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <569E3C86.20407@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Xen-devel Cc: George Dunlap , Tim Deegan , Doug Goldstein , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 13:39 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 19/01/16 09:46, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper > > Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? > > Not in the slightest. > > > What about nested virt? > > Nested virt is completely broken with respect to migration. Sorry, I meant impact (generally) on nested, not WRT migration. AIUI shadow is required for either L1 or L2 (not sure which). > > Are things which are defined in xen/arch/*/Rules.mk in this way > > overrideable from the old top-level .config or does one need to dive > > deeper > > to modify them? > > Absolutely everything anywhere in the build system is/was configurable > from the top .config OK, good, so no change here, that's fine then. > > Lastly, Tim is maintainer of the shadow code and should have been CC-d, > > also George as maintainer of the mm stuff might have an interest. Both > > CC-s > > added. > > Oops yes, although this is an entirely mechanical alteration to an > option which already existed. > > ~Andrew