From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org>
Subject: Re: Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:22:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453454520.7675.5.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452165737.21055.197.camel@citrix.com>
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 11:22 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer
> supported.
> Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I
> always have
> to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue.
>
> We should add rows to
> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features right
> under Initial Release giving first the date until which that tree is
> supported with backports and second the date until which security
> support
> will exist. We might also want to add a third "status" row. e.g.
> "Supported", "Security Support only", "EOL" (we'll deal with extended
> support by a third party when that next arises).
>
> I'm happy to make the edits, however I don't know what dates I would
> write
> here. Taking it to be 18 months of Support and a further 18 months of
> security support I would get:
> Xen 4.0 Xen 4.1 Xen 4.2 Xen 4.3 Xen 4.4 Xen 4.5 Xen 4.6
> Initial Release 7 April 2010 25 March 2011 17 Sept 2012 9 July 2013 10 March 2014 15 Jan 2015 13 Oct 2015
> Supported until EOL - ??? EOL - ??? EOL - ??? EOL - Jan 2015 EOL - Sept 2015 July 2016 April 2017
> Security support til EOL - ??? EOL - ??? EOL - ??? July 2016 March 2016 Jan 2017 Oct 2018
George pointed out that 4.4 only has 6 months security support here,
which is just me counting wrong I think. It should be March 2017.
Likewise 4.5 followed suite.
Both of them should have been 1 year later. I have updated the wiki.
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-22 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 18:28 [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-01-07 9:56 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-07 11:22 ` Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL) Ian Campbell
2016-01-07 11:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-07 12:00 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-07 13:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-07 16:02 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-07 12:44 ` Lars Kurth
2016-01-07 13:09 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-22 9:22 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-01-08 12:10 ` [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL Ian Jackson
2016-01-14 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453454520.7675.5.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.