From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs: show pipe inode in mount options
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:57:33 +0800
Message-ID: <1453510653.3042.21.camel@themaw.net>
References: <20151216120222.19097.54512.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
	 <568E8840.3010801@odin.com> <1452237640.2973.19.camel@themaw.net>
	 <568F9D85.6070601@odin.com> <1452257913.7030.25.camel@themaw.net>
	 <568FD028.5090207@odin.com> <1452303110.3067.29.camel@themaw.net>
	 <5693931F.9070101@odin.com> <56A213CA.5090704@odin.com>
	 <1453509017.3042.7.camel@themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=themaw.net; h=cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
	:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=3iyiXphRTyXckRom+pCw8XbWfPo=; b=OlErNP
	IPnmAE3P82E1JN0m6JcG3ZVLCckZwozmp8enLLsfAsRjCUCH1Syluo6nb8Rgjyka
	uJys3zQHkmrm8hdfDZBu+8KWgVn2viqs7PfcOtS7YyfoNXaNUQSmNEpprK1ikIMN
	OsN32CxLpsWYHh2JkeAcrgimXuyyfqtbM93PE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
	:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
	:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=3iyiXphRTyXckRo
	m+pCw8XbWfPo=; b=dbiQYNdpnoms1+R5rUM6QcxSUWGmT/t9YW7snc8yxo0TCoA
	z/o/wP94Ia0ZvEH5yAuAussp9p8qroekIRivLAblNYe5Kfk9xwEjWCtQijqMeFiH
	pme+NSgwjYNJztHwls11g45WOULSSgNx8jYhAX0GhsBnEf4mAcoAZSY5j/Cw=
In-Reply-To: <1453509017.3042.7.camel@themaw.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: skinsbursky@virtuozzo.com
Cc: criu@openvz.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 08:30 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 12:34 +0100, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > 
> > I would like to ask about any progress with this patch?
> > Any other requirements to make it able to merge?
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> Since there haven't been any comments from Al or Stephen I'm think I
> should include it in the series I plan on sending to linux-next to
> rename autofs4 to autofs (among other things).
> 
> I haven't had anything significant enough for autofs to warrant
> maintaining a tree and sending push requests so I'll need to ask
> Stephen what I need to do (perhaps you could offer some advise on
> that
> now Stephen, please).

Apologies, there appears to be a parse error in my grammar above,
sorry, and clearly "push" should be "pull" in the paragraph above.

> 
> I'm also struggling to get back to this and carry out the needed
> testing and I'll need to re-base the series too now but I'm getting
> there.
> 
> I didn't see a follow up patch with an updated description, did I
> miss
> it?
> 
> Ian
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in