All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ashok.raj@intel.com, bp@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, tony.luck@intel.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don't participate in rendezvous process" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:00:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453680006113204@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don't participate in rendezvous process

to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     x86-mce-ensure-offline-cpus-don-t-participate-in-rendezvous-process.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From d90167a941f62860f35eb960e1012aa2d30e7e94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:12:26 +0100
Subject: x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don't participate in rendezvous process

From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>

commit d90167a941f62860f35eb960e1012aa2d30e7e94 upstream.

Intel's MCA implementation broadcasts MCEs to all CPUs on the
node. This poses a problem for offlined CPUs which cannot
participate in the rendezvous process:

  Kernel panic - not syncing: Timeout: Not all CPUs entered broadcast exception handler
  Kernel Offset: disabled
  Rebooting in 100 seconds..

More specifically, Linux does a soft offline of a CPU when
writing a 0 to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online, which
doesn't prevent the #MC exception from being broadcasted to that
CPU.

Ensure that offline CPUs don't participate in the MCE rendezvous
and clear the RIP valid status bit so that a second MCE won't
cause a shutdown.

Without the patch, mce_start() will increment mce_callin and
wait for all CPUs. Offlined CPUs should avoid participating in
the rendezvous process altogether.

Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
[ Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449742346-21470-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c |   11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -999,6 +999,17 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *re
 	int flags = MF_ACTION_REQUIRED;
 	int lmce = 0;
 
+	/* If this CPU is offline, just bail out. */
+	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
+		u64 mcgstatus;
+
+		mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
+		if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) {
+			mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ist_enter(regs);
 
 	this_cpu_inc(mce_exception_count);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ashok.raj@intel.com are

queue-4.3/x86-mce-ensure-offline-cpus-don-t-participate-in-rendezvous-process.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-01-25  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1453680006113204@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.