From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs: show pipe inode in mount options Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:55:56 +0800 Message-ID: <1453780556.3067.15.camel@themaw.net> References: <20151216120222.19097.54512.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <568E8840.3010801@odin.com> <1452237640.2973.19.camel@themaw.net> <568F9D85.6070601@odin.com> <1452257913.7030.25.camel@themaw.net> <568FD028.5090207@odin.com> <1452303110.3067.29.camel@themaw.net> <5693931F.9070101@odin.com> <56A213CA.5090704@odin.com> <1453509017.3042.7.camel@themaw.net> <20160126101907.388686e7@canb.auug.org.au> <20160125154834.3afe2ede52d0342b61120943@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=themaw.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ji4MvQsgbDYZXz1+auexryL4J8I=; b=I22Hbg 5Nc1Ki4f9r+IiSMO2004NRixsmWM6uKg2RoIir1veF+ob89VpefVPQ3YTCjoNstS ccjAH+iuLk2mzCQZfQjbF4qsyAhzzDZYV3cEUaoBkqyvzR2SzSct3CetlzqQgaKH S5JVHJWRW6EWmuWicIitn6CxuhkUXhxHLrBTc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=ji4MvQsgbDYZXz1 +auexryL4J8I=; b=ANBo75Helax7Ay/hibJhZwlul23eihEeuHxe9Kxs4y9jJyP wyFZXAljnVO95iFqMxINo4D4BwEJjfEX6IeqI/+ANF3snbP4ckX1K1bVAraFCp7h y2aipBjXPa7ygVjG6ChgnN2XFT8EiNnku8Rgh8Vsuo9Qs+aDPKLHNU/zi17g= In-Reply-To: <20160125154834.3afe2ede52d0342b61120943@linux-foundation.org> Sender: autofs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell Cc: skinsbursky@virtuozzo.com, criu@openvz.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:48 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:19:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell < > sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > Hi Ian, > > > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:30:17 +0800 Ian Kent > > wrote: > > > > > > I haven't had anything significant enough for autofs to warrant > > > maintaining a tree and sending push requests so I'll need to ask > > > Stephen what I need to do (perhaps you could offer some advise on > > > that > > > now Stephen, please). > > > > I guess if its just a few patches every now and then, then Andrew > > Morton may be the best person to shepherd them upstream. > > yup, send 'em along. > > I actually was handling the autofs4 stuff back in 2014 for a bit. Thanks Andrew. Last time I tried to send the module rename series we got confused some how, patches not seen leading to conflicts in applying later patches IIRC, which lead to the recommendation I send them to linux-next. The series has grown a bit too now but I'm thinking I should send them in smaller groups, such as coding style fixes and white space fixes, change to use pr* logging, etc. Hopefully that will make the process much more straight forward. The thing is the patches are mostly not urgent which is why I keep postponing sending them when higher priority things come up. As for the patch from Stanislav, I'll put that at the top of my patch queue, have a quick look at it and send it over so that, hopefully, it can get merged. I'll probably send a couple of others too to get things going on with (what I'm calling) the module rename series. Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933178AbcAZD4J (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:56:09 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:41326 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752914AbcAZD4D (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:56:03 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: h90rujPCDRpTaBZ9O9aaCb8+lmkpq6NiJTt1JlSx8gt3 1453780562 Message-ID: <1453780556.3067.15.camel@themaw.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs: show pipe inode in mount options From: Ian Kent To: Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell Cc: skinsbursky@virtuozzo.com, criu@openvz.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:55:56 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20160125154834.3afe2ede52d0342b61120943@linux-foundation.org> References: <20151216120222.19097.54512.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <568E8840.3010801@odin.com> <1452237640.2973.19.camel@themaw.net> <568F9D85.6070601@odin.com> <1452257913.7030.25.camel@themaw.net> <568FD028.5090207@odin.com> <1452303110.3067.29.camel@themaw.net> <5693931F.9070101@odin.com> <56A213CA.5090704@odin.com> <1453509017.3042.7.camel@themaw.net> <20160126101907.388686e7@canb.auug.org.au> <20160125154834.3afe2ede52d0342b61120943@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:48 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:19:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell < > sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > Hi Ian, > > > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:30:17 +0800 Ian Kent > > wrote: > > > > > > I haven't had anything significant enough for autofs to warrant > > > maintaining a tree and sending push requests so I'll need to ask > > > Stephen what I need to do (perhaps you could offer some advise on > > > that > > > now Stephen, please). > > > > I guess if its just a few patches every now and then, then Andrew > > Morton may be the best person to shepherd them upstream. > > yup, send 'em along. > > I actually was handling the autofs4 stuff back in 2014 for a bit. Thanks Andrew. Last time I tried to send the module rename series we got confused some how, patches not seen leading to conflicts in applying later patches IIRC, which lead to the recommendation I send them to linux-next. The series has grown a bit too now but I'm thinking I should send them in smaller groups, such as coding style fixes and white space fixes, change to use pr* logging, etc. Hopefully that will make the process much more straight forward. The thing is the patches are mostly not urgent which is why I keep postponing sending them when higher priority things come up. As for the patch from Stanislav, I'll put that at the top of my patch queue, have a quick look at it and send it over so that, hopefully, it can get merged. I'll probably send a couple of others too to get things going on with (what I'm calling) the module rename series. Ian