From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mptlan: add checks for dma mapping errors Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:23:41 -0800 Message-ID: <1453911821.2322.13.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <56A6568B.9020707@ispras.ru> <1453744944-4065-1-git-send-email-khoroshilov@ispras.ru> <56A79FD3.2060200@redhat.com> <56A8ECCD.2010102@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56A8ECCD.2010102@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomas Henzl , Sathya Prakash , "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Alexey Khoroshilov , Sreekanth Reddy , PDL-MPT-FUSIONLINUX , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ldv-project@linuxtesting.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 17:14 +0100, Tomas Henzl wrote: > On 27.1.2016 06:44, Sathya Prakash wrote: > > There is no fusion based network card and resources exists today in > > Avago(LSI) to test this patch so we prefer to leave it as is. We > > would > > like to prevent any new changes on MPT (FC/SCSI/SAS/LAN) drivers as > > we > > don't have support for those cards anymore, is there a way we > > could > > remove those drivers from newer kernels or mark them as > > unmaintained?. > > There still are users of some of those drivers (mptsas for example) > in certain distributions, so even if in fact they aren't > directly maintained, we should keep them in mainline. Agreed: the last gen PA-RISC has a mptspi controller ... they'd get a bit annoyed if we remove it because they wouldn't be able to update their build machines to newer kernels. James