From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aP5QR-0007SV-Ox for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:33:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aP5QP-0000Nu-48 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:33:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]:37021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aP5QO-0000Ms-Q0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:33:05 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l66so46068367wml.0 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 01:33:04 -0800 (PST) From: Alvise Rigo Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:32:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1454059965-23402-4-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com> In-Reply-To: <1454059965-23402-1-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com> References: <1454059965-23402-1-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 03/16] softmmu: Simplify helper_*_st_name, wrap MMIO code List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com Cc: claudio.fontana@huawei.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jani.kokkonen@huawei.com, tech@virtualopensystems.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, rth@twiddle.net Attempting to simplify the helper_*_st_name, wrap the MMIO code into an inline function. Based on this work, Alex proposed the following patch series https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-01/msg01136.html that reduces code duplication of the softmmu_helpers. Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo --- softmmu_template.h | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/softmmu_template.h b/softmmu_template.h index 7029a03..3d388ec 100644 --- a/softmmu_template.h +++ b/softmmu_template.h @@ -396,6 +396,26 @@ static inline void glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_unl_access)(CPUArchState *env, } } +static inline void glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(CPUArchState *env, + DATA_TYPE val, + target_ulong addr, + TCGMemOpIdx oi, + unsigned mmu_idx, + int index, + uintptr_t retaddr) +{ + CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index]; + + if ((addr & (DATA_SIZE - 1)) != 0) { + glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_unl_access)(env, val, addr, mmu_idx, + oi, retaddr); + } + /* ??? Note that the io helpers always read data in the target + byte ordering. We should push the LE/BE request down into io. */ + val = TGT_LE(val); + glue(io_write, SUFFIX)(env, iotlbentry, val, addr, retaddr); +} + void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, DATA_TYPE val, TCGMemOpIdx oi, uintptr_t retaddr) { @@ -423,17 +443,8 @@ void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, DATA_TYPE val, /* Handle an IO access. */ if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) { - CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry; - if ((addr & (DATA_SIZE - 1)) != 0) { - glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_unl_access)(env, val, addr, mmu_idx, - oi, retaddr); - } - iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index]; - - /* ??? Note that the io helpers always read data in the target - byte ordering. We should push the LE/BE request down into io. */ - val = TGT_LE(val); - glue(io_write, SUFFIX)(env, iotlbentry, val, addr, retaddr); + glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi, + mmu_idx, index, retaddr); return; } @@ -488,6 +499,26 @@ static inline void glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_unl_access)(CPUArchState *env, } } +static inline void glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(CPUArchState *env, + DATA_TYPE val, + target_ulong addr, + TCGMemOpIdx oi, + unsigned mmu_idx, + int index, + uintptr_t retaddr) +{ + CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index]; + + if ((addr & (DATA_SIZE - 1)) != 0) { + glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_unl_access)(env, val, addr, mmu_idx, + oi, retaddr); + } + /* ??? Note that the io helpers always read data in the target + byte ordering. We should push the LE/BE request down into io. */ + val = TGT_BE(val); + glue(io_write, SUFFIX)(env, iotlbentry, val, addr, retaddr); +} + void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, DATA_TYPE val, TCGMemOpIdx oi, uintptr_t retaddr) { @@ -515,17 +546,8 @@ void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, DATA_TYPE val, /* Handle an IO access. */ if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) { - CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry; - if ((addr & (DATA_SIZE - 1)) != 0) { - glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_unl_access)(env, val, addr, mmu_idx, - oi, retaddr); - } - iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index]; - - /* ??? Note that the io helpers always read data in the target - byte ordering. We should push the LE/BE request down into io. */ - val = TGT_BE(val); - glue(io_write, SUFFIX)(env, iotlbentry, val, addr, retaddr); + glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi, + mmu_idx, index, retaddr); return; } -- 2.7.0