From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, axboe@fb.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
t.artem@lycos.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "block: ensure to split after potentially bouncing a bio" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:03:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454374992104197@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
block: ensure to split after potentially bouncing a bio
to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
block-ensure-to-split-after-potentially-bouncing-a-bio.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 23688bf4f830a89866fd0ed3501e342a7360fe4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:23:44 -0700
Subject: block: ensure to split after potentially bouncing a bio
From: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
commit 23688bf4f830a89866fd0ed3501e342a7360fe4f upstream.
blk_queue_bio() does split then bounce, which makes the segment
counting based on pages before bouncing and could go wrong. Move
the split to after bouncing, like we do for blk-mq, and the we
fix the issue of having the bio count for segments be wrong.
Fixes: 54efd50bfd87 ("block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios")
Tested-by: Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@lycos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1616,8 +1616,6 @@ static void blk_queue_bio(struct request
struct request *req;
unsigned int request_count = 0;
- blk_queue_split(q, &bio, q->bio_split);
-
/*
* low level driver can indicate that it wants pages above a
* certain limit bounced to low memory (ie for highmem, or even
@@ -1625,6 +1623,8 @@ static void blk_queue_bio(struct request
*/
blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
+ blk_queue_split(q, &bio, q->bio_split);
+
if (bio_integrity_enabled(bio) && bio_integrity_prep(bio)) {
bio->bi_error = -EIO;
bio_endio(bio);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com are
queue-4.3/block-ensure-to-split-after-potentially-bouncing-a-bio.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454374992104197@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.artem@lycos.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.