From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Wei Tang <tangwei@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, jason.low2@hp.com,
xypron.glpk@gmx.de, oleg@redhat.com, koct9i@gmail.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, cyphar@cyphar.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: use sizeof() instead of sizeof
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:21:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454433698.7291.24.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160202171146.GQ17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 17:11 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:02:16AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 15:45 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Wei Tang <tangwei@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> > []
> > > > > WARNING: sizeof sig->rlim should be sizeof(sig->rlim)
> > []
> > > > If anyone feels strongly about accepting such patches, then the right solution is
> > > > to create a Coccinelle semantic patch to run over the whole kernel and get over
> > > > with the churn once and for all.
> > >
> > > That, or a single patch taking that piece of idiocy out of checkpatch.pl...
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/11/103
>
> Umm... Matter of taste, really
On that I can agree. Idiocy rather less so.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 7:53 [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: use sizeof() instead of sizeof Wei Tang
2016-02-02 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-02 11:28 ` [PATCH] treewide: Use 'sizeof(x)' instead of 'sizeof x' Ingo Molnar
2016-02-02 13:58 ` Joe Perches
2016-02-02 15:45 ` [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: use sizeof() instead of sizeof Al Viro
2016-02-02 17:02 ` Joe Perches
2016-02-02 17:11 ` Al Viro
2016-02-02 17:21 ` Joe Perches [this message]
[not found] ` <CAOviyajXB2y5zuFhdRPQfVSe_NYvaFjjUz6f86e791AvFPYfMw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-02 17:04 ` Al Viro
2016-02-03 3:46 ` Kevin Easton
2016-02-03 4:02 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454433698.7291.24.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tangwei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.