From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:56:47 -0800
Subject: [Cocci] coccinelle: add style check for assignment in if
In-Reply-To: <56B9E1C2.7070008@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <1454935571-4054-1-git-send-email-kborer@gmail.com>
 <56B9A2F6.4040109@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1602091016200.2578@hadrien>
 <56B9E1C2.7070008@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <1455062207.3333.6.camel@perches.com>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 13:55 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > Would you like to consider also the reuse of SmPL variables
> > > like "org" and "report"?
> > 
> > I think that there is no point for these things, because checkpatch
> > already gives warnings about this issue.
> 
> Can the check result display be more convenient from the semantic
> patch script interface in comparison to the other tool?

-ENOPARSE. ?More detail please.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754700AbcBIX4y (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:56:54 -0500
Received: from smtprelay0242.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.242]:34551 "EHLO
	smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753115AbcBIX4w (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:56:52 -0500
X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D
X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:982:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:2840:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3873:3874:4321:5007:6117:6261:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:13894:14659:21080:30054:30070:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: paint24_1eaae2869f036
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1561
Message-ID: <1455062207.3333.6.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: coccinelle: add style check for assignment in if
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Kris Borer <kborer@gmail.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:56:47 -0800
In-Reply-To: <56B9E1C2.7070008@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <1454935571-4054-1-git-send-email-kborer@gmail.com>
	 <56B9A2F6.4040109@users.sourceforge.net>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1602091016200.2578@hadrien>
	 <56B9E1C2.7070008@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3-1ubuntu1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 13:55 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > Would you like to consider also the reuse of SmPL variables
> > > like "org" and "report"?
> > 
> > I think that there is no point for these things, because checkpatch
> > already gives warnings about this issue.
> 
> Can the check result display be more convenient from the semantic
> patch script interface in comparison to the other tool?

-ENOPARSE.  More detail please.