Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] build: specify minimum versions of gcc and binutils

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>]

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:32 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 11.02.16 at 14:21, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:31 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > On 11/02/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
> > > > 
> > > > To help people avoid having to figure out what versions of gcc and
> > > > binutils need to be supported document them explicitly.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > > 
> > > I would be tempted to abbreviate this to GCC 4.1 and Binutls 2.16,
> > > unless we specifically know of issues between the release and point
> > > releases.
> > 
> > I don't mind doing this but if there is any quibbling at all about it
> > then
> > I would simply go with what is below.
> 
> Yeah, I'd prefer the patches to go in as they're now: Both
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

I have applied them both with you ack and Andy's R-by since he said "Either
way".

Thanks everyone.