From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] livepatch: Detect offset for the ftrace location during build
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 03:13:29 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455293609.16012.9.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160210174517.8347D692C8@newverein.lst.de>
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 16:32 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>
> Livepatch works on x86_64 and s390 only when the ftrace call
> is at the very beginning of the function. But PPC is different.
> We need to handle TOC and save LR there before calling the
> global ftrace handler.
>
> Now, the problem is that the extra operations have different
> length on PPC depending on the used gcc version. It is
> 4 instructions (16 bytes) before gcc-6 and only 3 instructions
> (12 bytes) with gcc-6.
>
> This patch tries to detect the offset a generic way during
> build. It assumes that the offset of the ftrace location
> is the same for all functions. It modifies the existing
> recordmcount tool that is able to find read mcount locations
> directly from the object files. It adds an option -p
> to print the first found offset.
>
> The recordmcount tool is then used in the kernel/livepatch
> subdirectory to generate a header file. It defines
> a constant that is used to compute the ftrace location
> from the function address.
>
> Finally, we have to enable the C implementation of the
> recordmcount tool to be used on PPC and S390. It seems
> to work fine there. It should be more reliable because
> it reads the standardized elf structures. The old perl
> implementation uses rather complex regular expressions
> to parse objdump output and is therefore much more tricky.
I'm still missing something, I'm getting offset as 8
When I run, I get
scripts/recordmcount -p kernel/livepatch/core.o
#define KLP_FTRACE_LOCATION 8
scripts/recordmcount -p kernel/livepatch/ftrace-test.o
#define KLP_FTRACE_LOCATION 8
My sample fails as well, since the expected offset is 16.
I guess the script is being run against a not so good
test.
A quick hack (no signoff below, its just an experiment),
seems to do the trick for the provided sample-livepatch.
It is hacky because it uses the sample object and due to
lack of a better description of srctree, it uses
srctree/../..
I suspect the usage of recordmcount needs to be revisited
diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/Makefile b/kernel/livepatch/Makefile
index 65a44b68..10b5f38 100644
--- a/kernel/livepatch/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/livepatch/Makefile
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch.o
livepatch-objs := core.o
-always := $(hostprogs-y) ftrace-test.o
+always := $(hostprogs-y) $(srctree)/../../samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.o
# dependencies on generated files need to be listed explicitly
$(obj)/core.o: $(obj)/livepatch-ftrace.h
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ $(obj)/core.o: $(obj)/livepatch-ftrace.h
quiet_cmd_livepatch-rmcount = RMCOUNT $@
cmd_livepatch-rmcount = $(objtree)/scripts/recordmcount -p $< > $@
-$(obj)/livepatch-ftrace.h: $(obj)/ftrace-test.o $(objtree)/scripts/recordmcount
+$(obj)/livepatch-ftrace.h: $(obj)/../../samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.o $(objtree)/scripts/recordmcount
$(call if_changed,livepatch-rmcount)
targets += livepatch-ftrace.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-12 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 17:29 [PATCH v8 0/8] ftrace with regs + live patching for ppc64 LE (ABI v2) Torsten Duwe
2016-01-28 15:32 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] livepatch: Detect offset for the ftrace location during build Torsten Duwe
2016-02-12 16:13 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2016-02-12 16:45 ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-13 1:33 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-16 5:47 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-16 8:23 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-16 10:30 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-16 10:39 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-16 13:57 ` Petr Mladek
2016-02-17 3:08 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-23 17:00 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-24 6:37 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-24 6:55 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-24 9:23 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-24 11:22 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-24 7:51 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-10 16:21 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] ppc64 (le): prepare for -mprofile-kernel Torsten Duwe
2016-02-17 10:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-17 11:30 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-17 11:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:22 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] ppc use ftrace_modify_all_code default Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:25 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11 7:48 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-11 8:39 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-02-11 9:35 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-11 13:00 ` Murali Sampath
2016-02-11 13:00 ` Murali Sampath
2016-02-11 13:00 ` Murali Sampath
2016-02-11 13:00 ` Murali Sampath
2016-02-11 8:42 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11 9:34 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-15 10:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-15 12:56 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-02-15 14:04 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-15 22:21 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-16 4:53 ` Balbir Singh
2016-02-16 10:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-02-16 10:35 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs: disable profiling for some files Torsten Duwe
2016-02-10 16:34 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] Implement kernel live patching for ppc64le (ABIv2) Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11 9:01 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-02-10 16:36 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] Enable LIVEPATCH to be configured on ppc64le and add livepatch.o if it is selected Torsten Duwe
2016-02-11 6:18 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] ftrace with regs + live patching for ppc64 LE (ABI v2) Balbir Singh
2016-02-11 8:38 ` Torsten Duwe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455293609.16012.9.camel@gmail.com \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=duwe@lst.de \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.