From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com, hughd@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, mgorman@suse.de, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
rientjes@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm: hugetlb: call huge_pte_alloc() only if ptep is null" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:00:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455310854100192@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm: hugetlb: call huge_pte_alloc() only if ptep is null
to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-hugetlb-call-huge_pte_alloc-only-if-ptep-is-null.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 0d777df5d8953293be090d9ab5a355db893e8357 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:40:49 -0800
Subject: mm: hugetlb: call huge_pte_alloc() only if ptep is null
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
commit 0d777df5d8953293be090d9ab5a355db893e8357 upstream.
Currently at the beginning of hugetlb_fault(), we call huge_pte_offset()
and check whether the obtained *ptep is a migration/hwpoison entry or
not. And if not, then we get to call huge_pte_alloc(). This is racy
because the *ptep could turn into migration/hwpoison entry after the
huge_pte_offset() check. This race results in BUG_ON in
huge_pte_alloc().
We don't have to call huge_pte_alloc() when the huge_pte_offset()
returns non-NULL, so let's fix this bug with moving the code into else
block.
Note that the *ptep could turn into a migration/hwpoison entry after
this block, but that's not a problem because we have another
!pte_present check later (we never go into hugetlb_no_page() in that
case.)
Fixes: 290408d4a250 ("hugetlb: hugepage migration core")
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3590,12 +3590,12 @@ int hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
} else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry)))
return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE |
VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX(hstate_index(h));
+ } else {
+ ptep = huge_pte_alloc(mm, address, huge_page_size(h));
+ if (!ptep)
+ return VM_FAULT_OOM;
}
- ptep = huge_pte_alloc(mm, address, huge_page_size(h));
- if (!ptep)
- return VM_FAULT_OOM;
-
mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
idx = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, address);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com are
queue-4.3/mm-hugetlb-call-huge_pte_alloc-only-if-ptep-is-null.patch
queue-4.3/mm-hugetlbfs-fix-bugs-in-fallocate-hole-punch-of-areas-with-holes.patch
queue-4.3/mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-12 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455310854100192@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.