From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
mgorman@suse.de, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, rientjes@google.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:00:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455310858252168@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count
to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From a88c769548047b21f76fd71e04b6a3300ff17160 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:40:24 -0800
Subject: mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
commit a88c769548047b21f76fd71e04b6a3300ff17160 upstream.
When dequeue_huge_page_vma() in alloc_huge_page() fails, we fall back on
alloc_buddy_huge_page() to directly create a hugepage from the buddy
allocator.
In that case, however, if alloc_buddy_huge_page() succeeds we don't
decrement h->resv_huge_pages, which means that successful
hugetlb_fault() returns without releasing the reserve count. As a
result, subsequent hugetlb_fault() might fail despite that there are
still free hugepages.
This patch simply adds decrementing code on that code path.
I reproduced this problem when testing v4.3 kernel in the following situation:
- the test machine/VM is a NUMA system,
- hugepage overcommiting is enabled,
- most of hugepages are allocated and there's only one free hugepage
which is on node 0 (for example),
- another program, which calls set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND) to bind itself to
node 1, tries to allocate a hugepage,
- the allocation should fail but the reserve count is still hold.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1790,7 +1790,10 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_a
page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE);
if (!page)
goto out_uncharge_cgroup;
-
+ if (!avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, gbl_chg)) {
+ SetPagePrivate(page);
+ h->resv_huge_pages--;
+ }
spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
/* Fall through */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com are
queue-4.3/mm-hugetlb-call-huge_pte_alloc-only-if-ptep-is-null.patch
queue-4.3/mm-hugetlbfs-fix-bugs-in-fallocate-hole-punch-of-areas-with-holes.patch
queue-4.3/mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-12 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455310858252168@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.