From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peiyangx.qiu@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "tracing: Fix setting of start_index in find_next()" has been added to the 4.3-stable tree
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:03:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455404607111168@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tracing: Fix setting of start_index in find_next()
to the 4.3-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
tracing-fix-setting-of-start_index-in-find_next.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.3 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f36d1be2930ede0a1947686e1126ffda5d5ee1bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiu Peiyang <peiyangx.qiu@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:11:28 +0800
Subject: tracing: Fix setting of start_index in find_next()
From: Qiu Peiyang <peiyangx.qiu@intel.com>
commit f36d1be2930ede0a1947686e1126ffda5d5ee1bb upstream.
When we do cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/printk_formats, we hit kernel
panic at t_show.
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 2957 Comm: sh Tainted: G W O 3.14.55-x86_64-01062-gd4acdc7 #2
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811375b2>]
[<ffffffff811375b2>] t_show+0x22/0xe0
RSP: 0000:ffff88002b4ebe80 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004
RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: ffffffff81fd26a6 RDI: ffff880032f9f7b1
RBP: ffff88002b4ebe98 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 000000000000ffec
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000000000f R12: ffff880004d9b6c0
R13: 7365725f6d706400 R14: ffff880004d9b6c0 R15: ffffffff82020570
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003aa00000(0063) knlGS:00000000f776bc40
CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000f6c02ff0 CR3: 000000002c2b3000 CR4: 00000000001007f0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff811dc076>] seq_read+0x2f6/0x3e0
[<ffffffff811b749b>] vfs_read+0x9b/0x160
[<ffffffff811b7f69>] SyS_read+0x49/0xb0
[<ffffffff81a3a4b9>] ia32_do_call+0x13/0x13
---[ end trace 5bd9eb630614861e ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
When the first time find_next calls find_next_mod_format, it should
iterate the trace_bprintk_fmt_list to find the first print format of
the module. However in current code, start_index is smaller than *pos
at first, and code will not iterate the list. Latter container_of will
get the wrong address with former v, which will cause mod_fmt be a
meaningless object and so is the returned mod_fmt->fmt.
This patch will fix it by correcting the start_index. After fixed,
when the first time calls find_next_mod_format, start_index will be
equal to *pos, and code will iterate the trace_bprintk_fmt_list to
get the right module printk format, so is the returned mod_fmt->fmt.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5684B900.9000309@intel.com
Fixes: 102c9323c35a8 "tracing: Add __tracepoint_string() to export string pointers"
Signed-off-by: Qiu Peiyang <peiyangx.qiu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_printk.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
@@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ static const char **find_next(void *v, l
if (*pos < last_index + start_index)
return __start___tracepoint_str + (*pos - last_index);
+ start_index += last_index;
return find_next_mod_format(start_index, v, fmt, pos);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peiyangx.qiu@intel.com are
queue-4.3/tracing-fix-setting-of-start_index-in-find_next.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-13 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455404607111168@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=peiyangx.qiu@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.