From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: novalis@novalis.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mh8928@yahoo.com, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ext4: Fix handling of extended tv_sec" has been added to the 3.10-stable tree
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:04:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145548387810712@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: Fix handling of extended tv_sec
to the 3.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-fix-handling-of-extended-tv_sec.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From a4dad1ae24f850410c4e60f22823cba1289b8d52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Turner <novalis@novalis.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:34:37 -0500
Subject: ext4: Fix handling of extended tv_sec
From: David Turner <novalis@novalis.org>
commit a4dad1ae24f850410c4e60f22823cba1289b8d52 upstream.
In ext4, the bottom two bits of {a,c,m}time_extra are used to extend
the {a,c,m}time fields, deferring the year 2038 problem to the year
2446.
When decoding these extended fields, for times whose bottom 32 bits
would represent a negative number, sign extension causes the 64-bit
extended timestamp to be negative as well, which is not what's
intended. This patch corrects that issue, so that the only negative
{a,c,m}times are those between 1901 and 1970 (as per 32-bit signed
timestamps).
Some older kernels might have written pre-1970 dates with 1,1 in the
extra bits. This patch treats those incorrectly-encoded dates as
pre-1970, instead of post-2311, until kernel 4.20 is released.
Hopefully by then e2fsck will have fixed up the bad data.
Also add a comment explaining the encoding of ext4's extra {a,c,m}time
bits.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <novalis@novalis.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Mark Harris <mh8928@yahoo.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23732
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
+#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <linux/blockgroup_lock.h>
#include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
@@ -728,19 +729,55 @@ struct move_extent {
<= (EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + \
(einode)->i_extra_isize)) \
+/*
+ * We use an encoding that preserves the times for extra epoch "00":
+ *
+ * extra msb of adjust for signed
+ * epoch 32-bit 32-bit tv_sec to
+ * bits time decoded 64-bit tv_sec 64-bit tv_sec valid time range
+ * 0 0 1 -0x80000000..-0x00000001 0x000000000 1901-12-13..1969-12-31
+ * 0 0 0 0x000000000..0x07fffffff 0x000000000 1970-01-01..2038-01-19
+ * 0 1 1 0x080000000..0x0ffffffff 0x100000000 2038-01-19..2106-02-07
+ * 0 1 0 0x100000000..0x17fffffff 0x100000000 2106-02-07..2174-02-25
+ * 1 0 1 0x180000000..0x1ffffffff 0x200000000 2174-02-25..2242-03-16
+ * 1 0 0 0x200000000..0x27fffffff 0x200000000 2242-03-16..2310-04-04
+ * 1 1 1 0x280000000..0x2ffffffff 0x300000000 2310-04-04..2378-04-22
+ * 1 1 0 0x300000000..0x37fffffff 0x300000000 2378-04-22..2446-05-10
+ *
+ * Note that previous versions of the kernel on 64-bit systems would
+ * incorrectly use extra epoch bits 1,1 for dates between 1901 and
+ * 1970. e2fsck will correct this, assuming that it is run on the
+ * affected filesystem before 2242.
+ */
+
static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time)
{
- return cpu_to_le32((sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ?
- (time->tv_sec >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0) |
- ((time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK));
+ u32 extra = sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ?
+ ((time->tv_sec - (s32)time->tv_sec) >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0;
+ return cpu_to_le32(extra | (time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS));
}
static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra)
{
- if (sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4)
- time->tv_sec |= (__u64)(le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK)
- << 32;
- time->tv_nsec = (le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
+ if (unlikely(sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 &&
+ (extra & cpu_to_le32(EXT4_EPOCH_MASK)))) {
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4,20,0)
+ /* Handle legacy encoding of pre-1970 dates with epoch
+ * bits 1,1. We assume that by kernel version 4.20,
+ * everyone will have run fsck over the affected
+ * filesystems to correct the problem. (This
+ * backwards compatibility may be removed before this
+ * time, at the discretion of the ext4 developers.)
+ */
+ u64 extra_bits = le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+ if (extra_bits == 3 && ((time->tv_sec) & 0x80000000) != 0)
+ extra_bits = 0;
+ time->tv_sec += extra_bits << 32;
+#else
+ time->tv_sec += (u64)(le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK) << 32;
+#endif
+ }
+ time->tv_nsec = (le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
}
#define EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from novalis@novalis.org are
queue-3.10/ext4-fix-handling-of-extended-tv_sec.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-14 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145548387810712@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mh8928@yahoo.com \
--cc=novalis@novalis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.