From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: kinglongmee@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "FS-Cache: Increase reference of parent after registering, netfs success" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:18:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145548829814632@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
FS-Cache: Increase reference of parent after registering, netfs success
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fs-cache-increase-reference-of-parent-after-registering-netfs-success.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 86108c2e34a26e4bec3c6ddb23390bf8cedcf391 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:20:15 +0000
Subject: FS-Cache: Increase reference of parent after registering, netfs success
From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
commit 86108c2e34a26e4bec3c6ddb23390bf8cedcf391 upstream.
If netfs exist, fscache should not increase the reference of parent's
usage and n_children, otherwise, never be decreased.
v2: thanks David's suggest,
move increasing reference of parent if success
use kmem_cache_free() freeing primary_index directly
v3: don't move "netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index;"
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fscache/netfs.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fscache/netfs.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/netfs.c
@@ -47,9 +47,6 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fsca
netfs->primary_index->netfs_data = netfs;
netfs->primary_index->flags = 1 << FSCACHE_COOKIE_ENABLED;
- atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage);
- atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children);
-
spin_lock_init(&netfs->primary_index->lock);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&netfs->primary_index->backing_objects);
@@ -62,6 +59,9 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fsca
goto already_registered;
}
+ atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage);
+ atomic_inc(&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children);
+
list_add(&netfs->link, &fscache_netfs_list);
ret = 0;
@@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ already_registered:
up_write(&fscache_addremove_sem);
if (ret < 0) {
- netfs->primary_index->parent = NULL;
- __fscache_cookie_put(netfs->primary_index);
+ kmem_cache_free(fscache_cookie_jar, netfs->primary_index);
netfs->primary_index = NULL;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from kinglongmee@gmail.com are
queue-3.14/fs-cache-increase-reference-of-parent-after-registering-netfs-success.patch
queue-3.14/fs-cache-don-t-override-netfs-s-primary_index-if-registering-failed.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-14 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145548829814632@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.