From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B976FFA4 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u1GBF2X9001933; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:15:02 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sQuJOhx9f3Vm; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:15:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u1GBEvUU001928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:14:58 GMT Message-ID: <1455621297.16142.430.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Christopher Larson , bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:14:57 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1455463095.16142.412.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <1455463095.16142.412.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:15:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 15:18 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 00:15 +0000, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM Christopher Larson < > > kergoth@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > From: Christopher Larson > > > > > > An example prefix: `perl-5.22.1-r0 do_compile:` > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson > > I realize this may well be something to do for 2.2 rather than 2.1, > > but I wanted to throw it out and get thoughts on it, as I'm sick of > > manually prefixing our log messages in tasks :) > > I like the idea and actually wondered why this was an RFC, shouldn't > we > just do it? > > Having watched oe-selftest having a problems with this, I can see why > we may need to be more cautious :/. > > Still trying to assess how bad the issues there are. Fixed the issues in selftest so decided to merge this as it is an issue we've needed to address for a while. Thanks! Richard