Re: bad extent [5993525264384, 5993525280768), type mismatch with chunk

["Ángel González" <angel@fs.16bits.net>]

Qu Wenruo wrote:
> If you're really interesting in whether your fs has skinny metadata 
> enabled, you can check btrfs-show-super output.


> Like the following output indicates skinny metadata:
> ------
> incompat_flags		0x161
> 			( MIXED_BACKREF |
> 			  BIG_METADATA |
> 			  EXTENDED_IREF |
> 			  SKINNY_METADATA ) <<<Here
> ------
> 
> Even it has skinny metadata, it's still possible that some metadata
> are still in old format if you used btrfstune to convert an old fs to
> skinny metadata.

It was a freshly created filesystem. However, btrfs-show-super shows it
does *not* have skinny metadata:
> incompat_flags		0x61
> 			( MIXED_BACKREF |
> 			  BIG_METADATA |
> 			  EXTENDED_IREF )

Maybe gparted explicitely requested it to be created without skinny
metadata. That won't make me lose my sleep, though.


> But anyway, it's always good to see the problem solved.

Indeed :-)

Thanks again