All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: abanman@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, athorlton@sgi.com,
	greg@kroah.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rja@sgi.com,
	sjennings@variantweb.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	yinghai@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mm/memory_hotplug.c: check for missing sections in test_pages_in_a_zone()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:23:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456284224121130@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    mm/memory_hotplug.c: check for missing sections in test_pages_in_a_zone()

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     mm-memory_hotplug.c-check-for-missing-sections-in-test_pages_in_a_zone.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 5f0f2887f4de9508dcf438deab28f1de8070c271 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Banman <abanman@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:54:25 -0800
Subject: mm/memory_hotplug.c: check for missing sections in test_pages_in_a_zone()

From: Andrew Banman <abanman@sgi.com>

commit 5f0f2887f4de9508dcf438deab28f1de8070c271 upstream.

test_pages_in_a_zone() does not account for the possibility of missing
sections in the given pfn range.  pfn_valid_within always returns 1 when
CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE is not set, allowing invalid pfns from missing
sections to pass the test, leading to a kernel oops.

Wrap an additional pfn loop with PAGES_PER_SECTION granularity to check
for missing sections before proceeding into the zone-check code.

This also prevents a crash from offlining memory devices with missing
sections.  Despite this, it may be a good idea to keep the related patch
'[PATCH 3/3] drivers: memory: prohibit offlining of memory blocks with
missing sections' because missing sections in a memory block may lead to
other problems not covered by the scope of this fix.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Banman <abanman@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1220,23 +1220,30 @@ int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned lo
  */
 static int test_pages_in_a_zone(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
 {
-	unsigned long pfn;
+	unsigned long pfn, sec_end_pfn;
 	struct zone *zone = NULL;
 	struct page *page;
 	int i;
-	for (pfn = start_pfn;
+	for (pfn = start_pfn, sec_end_pfn = SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start_pfn);
 	     pfn < end_pfn;
-	     pfn += MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) {
-		i = 0;
-		/* This is just a CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE check.*/
-		while ((i < MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) && !pfn_valid_within(pfn + i))
-			i++;
-		if (i == MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES)
+	     pfn = sec_end_pfn + 1, sec_end_pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
+		/* Make sure the memory section is present first */
+		if (!present_section_nr(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)))
 			continue;
-		page = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
-		if (zone && page_zone(page) != zone)
-			return 0;
-		zone = page_zone(page);
+		for (; pfn < sec_end_pfn && pfn < end_pfn;
+		     pfn += MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) {
+			i = 0;
+			/* This is just a CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE check.*/
+			while ((i < MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) &&
+				!pfn_valid_within(pfn + i))
+				i++;
+			if (i == MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES)
+				continue;
+			page = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
+			if (zone && page_zone(page) != zone)
+				return 0;
+			zone = page_zone(page);
+		}
 	}
 	return 1;
 }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from abanman@sgi.com are

queue-3.14/mm-memory_hotplug.c-check-for-missing-sections-in-test_pages_in_a_zone.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-02-24  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1456284224121130@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=abanman@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=sjennings@variantweb.net \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.