All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: herton@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, peter@hurleysoftware.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "pty: make sure super_block is still valid in final /dev/tty close" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:23:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456284229124180@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    pty: make sure super_block is still valid in final /dev/tty close

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     pty-make-sure-super_block-is-still-valid-in-final-dev-tty-close.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 1f55c718c290616889c04946864a13ef30f64929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:56:58 -0200
Subject: pty: make sure super_block is still valid in final /dev/tty close

From: Herton R. Krzesinski <herton@redhat.com>

commit 1f55c718c290616889c04946864a13ef30f64929 upstream.

Considering current pty code and multiple devpts instances, it's possible
to umount a devpts file system while a program still has /dev/tty opened
pointing to a previosuly closed pty pair in that instance. In the case all
ptmx and pts/N files are closed, umount can be done. If the program closes
/dev/tty after umount is done, devpts_kill_index will use now an invalid
super_block, which was already destroyed in the umount operation after
running ->kill_sb. This is another "use after free" type of issue, but now
related to the allocated super_block instance.

To avoid the problem (warning at ida_remove and potential crashes) for
this specific case, I added two functions in devpts which grabs additional
references to the super_block, which pty code now uses so it makes sure
the super block structure is still valid until pty shutdown is done.
I also moved the additional inode references to the same functions, which
also covered similar case with inode being freed before /dev/tty final
close/shutdown.

Signed-off-by: Herton R. Krzesinski <herton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/tty/pty.c         |    9 ++++++---
 fs/devpts/inode.c         |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/devpts_fs.h |    4 ++++
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/tty/pty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/pty.c
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static void pty_unix98_shutdown(struct t
 	else
 		ptmx_inode = tty->link->driver_data;
 	devpts_kill_index(ptmx_inode, tty->index);
-	iput(ptmx_inode); /* drop reference we acquired at ptmx_open */
+	devpts_del_ref(ptmx_inode);
 }
 
 static const struct tty_operations ptm_unix98_ops = {
@@ -720,9 +720,12 @@ static int ptmx_open(struct inode *inode
 	 * still have /dev/tty opened pointing to the master/slave pair (ptmx
 	 * is closed/released before /dev/tty), we must make sure that the inode
 	 * is still valid when we call the final pty_unix98_shutdown, thus we
-	 * hold an additional reference to the ptmx inode
+	 * hold an additional reference to the ptmx inode. For the same /dev/tty
+	 * last close case, we also need to make sure the super_block isn't
+	 * destroyed (devpts instance unmounted), before /dev/tty is closed and
+	 * on its release devpts_kill_index is called.
 	 */
-	ihold(inode);
+	devpts_add_ref(inode);
 
 	tty_add_file(tty, filp);
 
--- a/fs/devpts/inode.c
+++ b/fs/devpts/inode.c
@@ -564,6 +564,26 @@ void devpts_kill_index(struct inode *ptm
 	mutex_unlock(&allocated_ptys_lock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * pty code needs to hold extra references in case of last /dev/tty close
+ */
+
+void devpts_add_ref(struct inode *ptmx_inode)
+{
+	struct super_block *sb = pts_sb_from_inode(ptmx_inode);
+
+	atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
+	ihold(ptmx_inode);
+}
+
+void devpts_del_ref(struct inode *ptmx_inode)
+{
+	struct super_block *sb = pts_sb_from_inode(ptmx_inode);
+
+	iput(ptmx_inode);
+	deactivate_super(sb);
+}
+
 /**
  * devpts_pty_new -- create a new inode in /dev/pts/
  * @ptmx_inode: inode of the master
--- a/include/linux/devpts_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/devpts_fs.h
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
 
 int devpts_new_index(struct inode *ptmx_inode);
 void devpts_kill_index(struct inode *ptmx_inode, int idx);
+void devpts_add_ref(struct inode *ptmx_inode);
+void devpts_del_ref(struct inode *ptmx_inode);
 /* mknod in devpts */
 struct inode *devpts_pty_new(struct inode *ptmx_inode, dev_t device, int index,
 		void *priv);
@@ -32,6 +34,8 @@ void devpts_pty_kill(struct inode *inode
 /* Dummy stubs in the no-pty case */
 static inline int devpts_new_index(struct inode *ptmx_inode) { return -EINVAL; }
 static inline void devpts_kill_index(struct inode *ptmx_inode, int idx) { }
+static inline void devpts_add_ref(struct inode *ptmx_inode) { }
+static inline void devpts_del_ref(struct inode *ptmx_inode) { }
 static inline struct inode *devpts_pty_new(struct inode *ptmx_inode,
 		dev_t device, int index, void *priv)
 {


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from herton@redhat.com are

queue-3.14/pty-make-sure-super_block-is-still-valid-in-final-dev-tty-close.patch
queue-3.14/pty-fix-possible-use-after-free-of-tty-driver_data.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-02-24  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1456284229124180@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herton@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.