From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, emilne@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hare@suse.de,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "scsi_sysfs: Fix queue_ramp_up_period return code" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:23:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456284235237105@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
scsi_sysfs: Fix queue_ramp_up_period return code
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
scsi_sysfs-fix-queue_ramp_up_period-return-code.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 863e02d0e173bb9d8cea6861be22820b25c076cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:49:54 +0100
Subject: scsi_sysfs: Fix queue_ramp_up_period return code
From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 863e02d0e173bb9d8cea6861be22820b25c076cc upstream.
Writing a number to /sys/bus/scsi/devices/<sdev>/queue_ramp_up_period
returns the value of that number instead of the number of bytes written.
This behavior can confuse programs expecting POSIX write() semantics.
Fix this by returning the number of bytes written instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ sdev_store_queue_ramp_up_period(struct d
return -EINVAL;
sdev->queue_ramp_up_period = msecs_to_jiffies(period);
- return period;
+ return count;
}
static struct device_attribute sdev_attr_queue_ramp_up_period =
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-3.14/scsi_sysfs-fix-queue_ramp_up_period-return-code.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456284235237105@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.