From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760270AbcBYJJL (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 04:09:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:38523 "EHLO mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754819AbcBYJJC (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 04:09:02 -0500 Message-ID: <1456391333.3709.8.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/entry/32: Add an ASM_CLAC to entry_SYSENTER_32 From: Mike Galbraith To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Brian Gerst , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Lutomirski , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Borislav Petkov , Denys Vlasenko , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:08:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160225084056.GC12294@gmail.com> References: <3e36be110724896e32a4a1fe73bacb349d3cba94.1456262295.git.luto@kernel.org> <56CE9897.6080702@zytor.com> <20160225081441.GA11615@gmail.com> <1456388974.3923.6.camel@gmail.com> <20160225084056.GC12294@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 09:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 09:14 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > But but ... 'context tracking' is not really something that a regular distro > > > kernel cares about much - it's a nohz-full special AFAICS. > > Let me qualify that: with the timer code maintenance hat on I really love all nohz > variants (the deeper the better), but now I have my x86 maintainer hat on, and as > such I'm really annoyed at those nohz folks adding overhead to the syscall hot > path! ;-) > > > (psst.. distros are shipping it) > > Yeah, indeed, Fedora does - but AFAICS: > > fomalhaut:~> grep NO_HZ /boot/config-4.1.13-100.fc21.x86_64 > CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=y > # CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE is not set > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y > # CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL is not set > # CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE is not set > CONFIG_NO_HZ=y > CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y > > ... which won't result in actual full-nohz CPUs unless you boot it with a special > boot parameter, right? Yeah, you have to manually enable it unless you (in a suicidal moment) enable CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL. > What is the easiest way to query which/how many CPUs are in nohz-full mode and do > context tracking? I somehow thought /proc/timer_* had that info, but that does not > appear to be the case. /sys/devices/system/cpu/nohz_full -Mike