Re: [PATCH V3] cpufreq: qoriq: Register cooling device based on device tree

[Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>]

On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 18:04 -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > > On Friday 26 February 2016 17:07:09 Li Yang wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I don't have a perfect solution either.  But I think this is still
> > > > better than making cpufreq not usable.  The cpufreq driver will print
> > > > out an error message if thermal is not reachable.  Maybe this can
> > > > relief the confusion a little bit?
> > > 
> > > With my patch, the configuration will just force the cpufreq
> > > driver to be a loadable module as well if thermal is a module,
> > > so the dependency can be resolved by loading the thermal module first.
> > 
> > It would be perfect if this it true.  But I tried with the following
> > change, it just makes QORIQ_CPUFREQ non-selectable if THERMAL=m.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > index dcb972a38fbc..ca05037dd565 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> > @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ endif
> >  config QORIQ_CPUFREQ
> >         tristate "CPU frequency scaling driver for Freescale QorIQ SoCs"
> >         depends on OF && COMMON_CLK && (PPC_E500MC || ARM)
> > +       depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL=y
> >         select CLK_QORIQ
> >         help
> >           This adds the CPUFreq driver support for Freescale QorIQ SoCs
> 
> 
> I find we can achieve your desired result with the following change instead:
> 
> +       depends on (THERMAL=m && m) || THERMAL=y || THERMAL=n

"depends on THERMAL || !THERMAL" should also work.

-Scott