All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <subashab@codeaurora.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <ek@google.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ipv6: addrconf: Fix recursive spin lock call" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:45:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14567859015172@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ipv6: addrconf: Fix recursive spin lock call

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ipv6-addrconf-fix-recursive-spin-lock-call.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Feb 29 14:33:50 PST 2016
From: "subashab@codeaurora.org" <subashab@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 02:11:10 +0000
Subject: ipv6: addrconf: Fix recursive spin lock call

From: "subashab@codeaurora.org" <subashab@codeaurora.org>

[ Upstream commit 16186a82de1fdd868255448274e64ae2616e2640 ]

A rcu stall with the following backtrace was seen on a system with
forwarding, optimistic_dad and use_optimistic set. To reproduce,
set these flags and allow ipv6 autoconf.

This occurs because the device write_lock is acquired while already
holding the read_lock. Back trace below -

INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU { 1}  (t=2100 jiffies
 g=3992 c=3991 q=4471)
<6> Task dump for CPU 1:
<2> kworker/1:0     R  running task    12168    15   2 0x00000002
<2> Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work
<6> Call trace:
<2> [<ffffffc000084da8>] el1_irq+0x68/0xdc
<2> [<ffffffc000cc4e0c>] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x20/0x30
<2> [<ffffffc000bc5dd8>] __ipv6_dev_ac_inc+0x64/0x1b4
<2> [<ffffffc000bcbd2c>] addrconf_join_anycast+0x9c/0xc4
<2> [<ffffffc000bcf9f0>] __ipv6_ifa_notify+0x160/0x29c
<2> [<ffffffc000bcfb7c>] ipv6_ifa_notify+0x50/0x70
<2> [<ffffffc000bd035c>] addrconf_dad_work+0x314/0x334
<2> [<ffffffc0000b64c8>] process_one_work+0x244/0x3fc
<2> [<ffffffc0000b7324>] worker_thread+0x2f8/0x418
<2> [<ffffffc0000bb40c>] kthread+0xe0/0xec

v2: do addrconf_dad_kick inside read lock and then acquire write
lock for ipv6_ifa_notify as suggested by Eric

Fixes: 7fd2561e4ebdd ("net: ipv6: Add a sysctl to make optimistic
addresses useful candidates")

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -3506,6 +3506,7 @@ static void addrconf_dad_begin(struct in
 {
 	struct inet6_dev *idev = ifp->idev;
 	struct net_device *dev = idev->dev;
+	bool notify = false;
 
 	addrconf_join_solict(dev, &ifp->addr);
 
@@ -3551,7 +3552,7 @@ static void addrconf_dad_begin(struct in
 			/* Because optimistic nodes can use this address,
 			 * notify listeners. If DAD fails, RTM_DELADDR is sent.
 			 */
-			ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_NEWADDR, ifp);
+			notify = true;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -3559,6 +3560,8 @@ static void addrconf_dad_begin(struct in
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
 	read_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
+	if (notify)
+		ipv6_ifa_notify(RTM_NEWADDR, ifp);
 }
 
 static void addrconf_dad_start(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from subashab@codeaurora.org are

queue-4.4/ipv6-addrconf-fix-recursive-spin-lock-call.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-02-29 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14567859015172@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ek@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.