From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail333.us4.mandrillapp.com ([205.201.137.77]:34475 "EHLO mail333.us4.mandrillapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752564AbcCAIPv (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:15:51 -0500 Received: from pmta03.dal05.mailchimp.com (127.0.0.1) by mail333.us4.mandrillapp.com id hql7re174no1 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:15:43 +0000 (envelope-from ) From: Subject: Patch "expand dentry_kill(dentry, 0) in shrink_dentry_list()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree To: , Cc: , Message-Id: <1456815003162104@kroah.com> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:15:43 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled expand dentry_kill(dentry, 0) in shrink_dentry_list() to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: expand-dentry_kill-dentry-0-in-shrink_dentry_list.patch and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >>From ff2fde9929feb2aef45377ce56b8b12df85dda69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 13:59:13 -0400 Subject: expand dentry_kill(dentry, 0) in shrink_dentry_list() From: Al Viro commit ff2fde9929feb2aef45377ce56b8b12df85dda69 upstream. Result will be massaged to saner shape in the next commits. It is ugly, no questions - the point of that one is to be a provably equivalent transformation (and it might be worth splitting a bit more). Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/dcache.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -802,6 +802,7 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct li struct dentry *dentry, *parent; while (!list_empty(list)) { + struct inode *inode; dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru); spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock); /* @@ -829,23 +830,26 @@ static void shrink_dentry_list(struct li continue; } - parent = dentry_kill(dentry, 0); - /* - * If dentry_kill returns NULL, we have nothing more to do. - */ - if (!parent) - continue; - - if (unlikely(parent == dentry)) { - /* - * trylocks have failed and d_lock has been held the - * whole time, so it could not have been added to any - * other lists. Just add it back to the shrink list. - */ + inode = dentry->d_inode; + if (inode && unlikely(!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock))) { d_shrink_add(dentry, list); spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); continue; } + + parent = NULL; + if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) { + parent = dentry->d_parent; + if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock))) { + if (inode) + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); + d_shrink_add(dentry, list); + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); + continue; + } + } + + __dentry_kill(dentry); /* * We need to prune ancestors too. This is necessary to prevent * quadratic behavior of shrink_dcache_parent(), but is also Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk are queue-3.14/lock_parent-don-t-step-on-stale-d_parent-of-all-but-freed-one.patch queue-3.14/lift-the-already-marked-killed-case-into-shrink_dentry_list.patch queue-3.14/expand-dentry_kill-dentry-0-in-shrink_dentry_list.patch queue-3.14/bcache-fix-a-leak-in-bch_cached_dev_run.patch queue-3.14/dcache-add-missing-lockdep-annotation.patch queue-3.14/dealing-with-the-rest-of-shrink_dentry_list-livelock.patch queue-3.14/split-dentry_kill.patch queue-3.14/shrink_dentry_list-take-parent-s-d_lock-earlier.patch queue-3.14/dentry_kill-doesn-t-need-the-second-argument-now.patch