From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling initial_watermarks (rev2)
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:30:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456831831.12589.1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160301104550.GF15993@intel.com>
On ti, 2016-03-01 at 12:45 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:32:53PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 07:24 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > >
> > > Series: drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling
> > > initial_watermarks (rev2)
> > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3930/
> > > State : failure
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > Series 3930v2 drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling
> > > initial_watermarks
> > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3930/revisions/2/
> > > mbox
> > > /
> > >
> > > Test kms_flip:
> > > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE
> > > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> > > pass -> FAIL (hsw-gt2)
> >
> > On HSW this patch shouldn't matter, but I haven't seen this problem
> > earlier, so opened a bug for it:
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94347
>
> Could be a duplicate of
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
> but I was too lazy to see i the ts vs. seq has the same 1 frame
> difference. We should improve the asserts in the test to give us more
> easily digestible information.
Yep, looks like the same ~+16ms difference. I marked the bug as a
duplicate.
--Imre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-29 19:20 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling initial_watermarks Imre Deak
2016-02-29 19:49 ` Matt Roper
2016-02-29 20:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Imre Deak
2016-02-29 21:06 ` Matt Roper
2016-02-29 21:35 ` Imre Deak
2016-03-01 7:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add missing NULL check before calling initial_watermarks (rev2) Patchwork
2016-03-01 10:32 ` Imre Deak
2016-03-01 10:42 ` Imre Deak
2016-03-01 10:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-01 11:30 ` Imre Deak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456831831.12589.1.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.