All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>, <erezsh@mellanox.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "IB/cm: Fix a recently introduced deadlock" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 21:42:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <145686855815944@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    IB/cm: Fix a recently introduced deadlock

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ib-cm-fix-a-recently-introduced-deadlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 4bfdf635c668869c69fd18ece37ec66fb6f38fcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 13:17:46 +0100
Subject: IB/cm: Fix a recently introduced deadlock

From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>

commit 4bfdf635c668869c69fd18ece37ec66fb6f38fcf upstream.

ib_send_cm_drep() calls cm_enter_timewait() while holding a spinlock
that can be locked from inside an interrupt handler. Hence do not
enable interrupts inside cm_enter_timewait() if called with interrupts
disabled.

This patch fixes e.g. the following deadlock:
Acked-by: Erez Shitrit <erezsh@mellanox.com>

=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
4.4.0-rc7+ #1 Tainted: G            E
---------------------------------
inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
swapper/8/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
(&(&cm_id_priv->lock)->rlock){?.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa036eec4>] cm_establish+0x
74/0x1b0 [ib_cm]
{HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
  [<ffffffff810a3c11>] mark_held_locks+0x71/0x90
  [<ffffffff810a3e87>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xa7/0x1c0
  [<ffffffff810a3fad>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
  [<ffffffff8151c40b>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x40
  [<ffffffffa036ea8e>] cm_enter_timewait+0xae/0x100 [ib_cm]
  [<ffffffffa036ff76>] ib_send_cm_drep+0xb6/0x190 [ib_cm]
  [<ffffffffa052ed08>] srp_cm_handler+0x128/0x1a0 [ib_srp]
  [<ffffffffa0370340>] cm_process_work+0x20/0xf0 [ib_cm]
  [<ffffffffa0371335>] cm_dreq_handler+0x135/0x2c0 [ib_cm]
  [<ffffffffa03733c5>] cm_work_handler+0x75/0xd0 [ib_cm]
  [<ffffffff8107184d>] process_one_work+0x1bd/0x460
  [<ffffffff81073148>] worker_thread+0x118/0x420
  [<ffffffff81078454>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
  [<ffffffff8151cbbf>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
irq event stamp: 1672286
hardirqs last  enabled at (1672283): [<ffffffff81408ec0>] poll_idle+0x10/0x80
hardirqs last disabled at (1672284): [<ffffffff8151d304>] common_interrupt+0x84/0x89
softirqs last  enabled at (1672286): [<ffffffff8105b4dc>] _local_bh_enable+0x1c/0x50
softirqs last disabled at (1672285): [<ffffffff8105b697>] irq_enter+0x47/0x70

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(&cm_id_priv->lock)->rlock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&(&cm_id_priv->lock)->rlock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

no locks held by swapper/8/0.

stack backtrace:
CPU: 8 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/8 Tainted: G            E   4.4.0-rc7+ #1
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R430/03XKDV, BIOS 1.0.2 11/17/2014
 ffff88045af5e950 ffff88046e503a88 ffffffff81251c1b 0000000000000007
 0000000000000006 0000000000000003 ffff88045af5ddc0 ffff88046e503ad8
 ffffffff810a32f4 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81251c1b>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x74
 [<ffffffff810a32f4>] print_usage_bug+0x184/0x190
 [<ffffffff810a36e2>] mark_lock_irq+0xf2/0x290
 [<ffffffff810a3995>] mark_lock+0x115/0x1b0
 [<ffffffff810a3b8c>] mark_irqflags+0x15c/0x170
 [<ffffffff810a4fef>] __lock_acquire+0x1ef/0x560
 [<ffffffff810a53c2>] lock_acquire+0x62/0x80
 [<ffffffff8151bd33>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x60
 [<ffffffffa036eec4>] cm_establish+0x74/0x1b0 [ib_cm]
 [<ffffffffa036f031>] ib_cm_notify+0x31/0x100 [ib_cm]
 [<ffffffffa0637f24>] srpt_qp_event+0x54/0xd0 [ib_srpt]
 [<ffffffffa0196052>] mlx4_ib_qp_event+0x72/0xc0 [mlx4_ib]
 [<ffffffffa00775b9>] mlx4_qp_event+0x69/0xd0 [mlx4_core]
 [<ffffffffa006000e>] mlx4_eq_int+0x51e/0xd50 [mlx4_core]
 [<ffffffffa006084f>] mlx4_msi_x_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [mlx4_core]
 [<ffffffff810b67b0>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x40/0x110
 [<ffffffff810b68bf>] handle_irq_event+0x3f/0x70
 [<ffffffff810ba7f9>] handle_edge_irq+0x79/0x120
 [<ffffffff81007f3d>] handle_irq+0x5d/0x130
 [<ffffffff810071fd>] do_IRQ+0x6d/0x130
 [<ffffffff8151d309>] common_interrupt+0x89/0x89
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff8140895f>] cpuidle_enter_state+0xcf/0x200
 [<ffffffff81408aa2>] cpuidle_enter+0x12/0x20
 [<ffffffff810990d6>] call_cpuidle+0x36/0x60
 [<ffffffff81099163>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x63/0x110
 [<ffffffff8109930a>] cpu_idle_loop+0xfa/0x130
 [<ffffffff8109934e>] cpu_startup_entry+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff8103c443>] start_secondary+0x83/0x90

Fixes: commit be4b499323bf ("IB/cm: Do not queue work to a device that's going away")
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Erez Shitrit <erezsh@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
@@ -782,11 +782,11 @@ static void cm_enter_timewait(struct cm_
 	wait_time = cm_convert_to_ms(cm_id_priv->av.timeout);
 
 	/* Check if the device started its remove_one */
-	spin_lock_irq(&cm.lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&cm.lock, flags);
 	if (!cm_dev->going_down)
 		queue_delayed_work(cm.wq, &cm_id_priv->timewait_info->work.work,
 				   msecs_to_jiffies(wait_time));
-	spin_unlock_irq(&cm.lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm.lock, flags);
 
 	cm_id_priv->timewait_info = NULL;
 }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bart.vanassche@sandisk.com are

queue-4.4/ib-cm-fix-a-recently-introduced-deadlock.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-03-01 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=145686855815944@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=erezsh@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.