From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
<jmmahler@gmail.com>, <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
<linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/irq: Check vector allocation early" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 22:42:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145687216616791@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/irq: Check vector allocation early
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-irq-check-vector-allocation-early.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 3716fd27a604d61a91cda47083504971486b80f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:30:48 +0000
Subject: x86/irq: Check vector allocation early
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
commit 3716fd27a604d61a91cda47083504971486b80f1 upstream.
__assign_irq_vector() uses the vector_cpumask which is assigned by
apic->vector_allocation_domain() without doing basic sanity checks. That can
result in a situation where the final assignement of a newly found vector
fails in apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(). So we have to do rollbacks for no
reason.
apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() only fails if
vector_cpumask & requested_cpumask & cpu_online_mask
is empty.
Check for this condition right away and if the result is empty try immediately
the next possible cpu in the requested mask. So in case of a failure the old
setting is unchanged and we can remove the rollback code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.561877324@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct apic_chip_data {
struct irq_domain *x86_vector_domain;
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(vector_lock);
-static cpumask_var_t vector_cpumask, searched_cpumask;
+static cpumask_var_t vector_cpumask, vector_searchmask, searched_cpumask;
static struct irq_chip lapic_controller;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
static struct apic_chip_data *legacy_irq_data[NR_IRQS_LEGACY];
@@ -128,8 +128,20 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
while (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
int new_cpu, vector, offset;
+ /* Get the possible target cpus for @mask/@cpu from the apic */
apic->vector_allocation_domain(cpu, vector_cpumask, mask);
+ /*
+ * Clear the offline cpus from @vector_cpumask for searching
+ * and verify whether the result overlaps with @mask. If true,
+ * then the call to apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and() will
+ * succeed as well. If not, no point in trying to find a
+ * vector in this mask.
+ */
+ cpumask_and(vector_searchmask, vector_cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+ if (!cpumask_intersects(vector_searchmask, mask))
+ goto next_cpu;
+
if (cpumask_subset(vector_cpumask, d->domain)) {
if (cpumask_equal(vector_cpumask, d->domain))
goto success;
@@ -162,7 +174,7 @@ next:
if (test_bit(vector, used_vectors))
goto next;
- for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, vector_cpumask, cpu_online_mask) {
+ for_each_cpu(new_cpu, vector_searchmask) {
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector]))
goto next;
}
@@ -174,7 +186,7 @@ next:
d->move_in_progress =
cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
}
- for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, vector_cpumask, cpu_online_mask)
+ for_each_cpu(new_cpu, vector_searchmask)
per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = irq_to_desc(irq);
d->cfg.vector = vector;
cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
@@ -196,8 +208,14 @@ next_cpu:
return -ENOSPC;
success:
- /* cache destination APIC IDs into cfg->dest_apicid */
- return apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(mask, d->domain, &d->cfg.dest_apicid);
+ /*
+ * Cache destination APIC IDs into cfg->dest_apicid. This cannot fail
+ * as we already established, that mask & d->domain & cpu_online_mask
+ * is not empty.
+ */
+ BUG_ON(apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(mask, d->domain,
+ &d->cfg.dest_apicid));
+ return 0;
}
static int assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *data,
@@ -407,6 +425,7 @@ int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
arch_init_htirq_domain(x86_vector_domain);
BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&vector_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL));
+ BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&vector_searchmask, GFP_KERNEL));
BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&searched_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL));
return arch_early_ioapic_init();
@@ -496,14 +515,7 @@ static int apic_set_affinity(struct irq_
return -EINVAL;
err = assign_irq_vector(irq, data, dest);
- if (err) {
- if (assign_irq_vector(irq, data,
- irq_data_get_affinity_mask(irq_data)))
- pr_err("Failed to recover vector for irq %d\n", irq);
- return err;
- }
-
- return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
+ return err ? err : IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
}
static struct irq_chip lapic_controller = {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tglx@linutronix.de are
queue-4.4/x86-irq-validate-that-irq-descriptor-is-still-active.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-outgoing-cpu-from-vector-cleanup-mask.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-get-rid-of-code-duplication.patch
queue-4.4/x86-entry-compat-add-missing-clac-to-entry_int80_32.patch
queue-4.4/tick-nohz-set-the-correct-expiry-when-switching-to-nohz-lowres-mode.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-mxs-add-missing-set_handle_irq.patch
queue-4.4/genirq-validate-action-before-dereferencing-it-in-handle_irq_event_percpu.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-offline-cpus-from-vector-cleanup.patch
queue-4.4/posix-clock-fix-return-code-on-the-poll-method-s-error-path.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-return-path-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/cputime-prevent-32bit-overflow-in-time_to_cputime.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-copy-vectormask-instead-of-an-and-operation.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-irq_force_move_complete-with-irq-descriptor.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-chip-irq_set_affinity-in-proper-context.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-plug-vector-cleanup-race.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-do-not-use-apic_chip_data.old_domain-as-temporary-buffer.patch
queue-4.4/clockevents-tcb_clksrc-prevent-disabling-an-already-disabled-clock.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-search-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-the-cpumask-allocation-from-send_cleanup_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-fix-a-race-in-x86_vector_free_irqs.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-check-vector-allocation-early.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-omap-intc-add-support-for-spurious-irq-handling.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-clear-move_in_progress-before-sending-cleanup-ipi.patch
queue-4.4/x86-mpx-fix-off-by-one-comparison-with-nr_registers.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-atmel-aic-fix-wrong-bit-operation-for-irq-priority.patch
queue-4.4/revert-workqueue-make-sure-delayed-work-run-in-local-cpu.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145687216616791@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.