All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	<jmmahler@gmail.com>, <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
	<linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/irq: Get rid of code duplication" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 22:42:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <145687216918698@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    x86/irq: Get rid of code duplication

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     x86-irq-get-rid-of-code-duplication.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From ab25ac02148b600e645f77cfb8b8ea415ed75bb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:30:49 +0000
Subject: x86/irq: Get rid of code duplication

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

commit ab25ac02148b600e645f77cfb8b8ea415ed75bb4 upstream.

Reusing an existing vector and assigning a new vector has duplicated
code. Consolidate it.

This is also a preparatory patch for finally plugging the cleanup race.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.721599216@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |   33 +++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
 	 */
 	static int current_vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + VECTOR_OFFSET_START;
 	static int current_offset = VECTOR_OFFSET_START % 16;
-	int cpu;
+	int cpu, vector;
 
 	if (d->move_in_progress)
 		return -EBUSY;
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
 	cpumask_clear(searched_cpumask);
 	cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
 	while (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
-		int new_cpu, vector, offset;
+		int new_cpu, offset;
 
 		/* Get the possible target cpus for @mask/@cpu from the apic */
 		apic->vector_allocation_domain(cpu, vector_cpumask, mask);
@@ -146,16 +146,12 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
 			if (cpumask_equal(vector_cpumask, d->domain))
 				goto success;
 			/*
-			 * New cpumask using the vector is a proper subset of
-			 * the current in use mask. So cleanup the vector
-			 * allocation for the members that are not used anymore.
+			 * Mark the cpus which are not longer in the mask for
+			 * cleanup.
 			 */
-			cpumask_andnot(d->old_domain, d->domain,
-				       vector_cpumask);
-			d->move_in_progress =
-			   cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
-			cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
-			goto success;
+			cpumask_andnot(d->old_domain, d->domain, vector_cpumask);
+			vector = d->cfg.vector;
+			goto update;
 		}
 
 		vector = current_vector;
@@ -181,16 +177,12 @@ next:
 		/* Found one! */
 		current_vector = vector;
 		current_offset = offset;
-		if (d->cfg.vector) {
+		/* Schedule the old vector for cleanup on all cpus */
+		if (d->cfg.vector)
 			cpumask_copy(d->old_domain, d->domain);
-			d->move_in_progress =
-			   cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
-		}
 		for_each_cpu(new_cpu, vector_searchmask)
 			per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = irq_to_desc(irq);
-		d->cfg.vector = vector;
-		cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
-		goto success;
+		goto update;
 
 next_cpu:
 		/*
@@ -207,6 +199,11 @@ next_cpu:
 	}
 	return -ENOSPC;
 
+update:
+	/* Cleanup required ? */
+	d->move_in_progress = cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
+	d->cfg.vector = vector;
+	cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
 success:
 	/*
 	 * Cache destination APIC IDs into cfg->dest_apicid. This cannot fail


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tglx@linutronix.de are

queue-4.4/x86-irq-validate-that-irq-descriptor-is-still-active.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-outgoing-cpu-from-vector-cleanup-mask.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-get-rid-of-code-duplication.patch
queue-4.4/x86-entry-compat-add-missing-clac-to-entry_int80_32.patch
queue-4.4/tick-nohz-set-the-correct-expiry-when-switching-to-nohz-lowres-mode.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-mxs-add-missing-set_handle_irq.patch
queue-4.4/genirq-validate-action-before-dereferencing-it-in-handle_irq_event_percpu.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-offline-cpus-from-vector-cleanup.patch
queue-4.4/posix-clock-fix-return-code-on-the-poll-method-s-error-path.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-return-path-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/cputime-prevent-32bit-overflow-in-time_to_cputime.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-copy-vectormask-instead-of-an-and-operation.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-irq_force_move_complete-with-irq-descriptor.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-chip-irq_set_affinity-in-proper-context.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-plug-vector-cleanup-race.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-do-not-use-apic_chip_data.old_domain-as-temporary-buffer.patch
queue-4.4/clockevents-tcb_clksrc-prevent-disabling-an-already-disabled-clock.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-search-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-the-cpumask-allocation-from-send_cleanup_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-fix-a-race-in-x86_vector_free_irqs.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-check-vector-allocation-early.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-omap-intc-add-support-for-spurious-irq-handling.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-clear-move_in_progress-before-sending-cleanup-ipi.patch
queue-4.4/x86-mpx-fix-off-by-one-comparison-with-nr_registers.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-atmel-aic-fix-wrong-bit-operation-for-irq-priority.patch
queue-4.4/revert-workqueue-make-sure-delayed-work-run-in-local-cpu.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-03-01 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=145687216918698@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.