From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
<jmmahler@gmail.com>, <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
<linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/irq: Reorganize the return path in assign_irq_vector" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 22:42:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145687217225194@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/irq: Reorganize the return path in assign_irq_vector
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-irq-reorganize-the-return-path-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 433cbd57d190a1cdd02f243df41c3d7f55ec4b94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:30:46 +0000
Subject: x86/irq: Reorganize the return path in assign_irq_vector
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
commit 433cbd57d190a1cdd02f243df41c3d7f55ec4b94 upstream.
Use an explicit goto for the cases where we have success in the search/update
and return -ENOSPC if the search loop ends due to no space.
Preparatory patch for fixes. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.403491024@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -116,13 +116,12 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
*/
static int current_vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + VECTOR_OFFSET_START;
static int current_offset = VECTOR_OFFSET_START % 16;
- int cpu, err;
+ int cpu;
if (d->move_in_progress)
return -EBUSY;
/* Only try and allocate irqs on cpus that are present */
- err = -ENOSPC;
cpumask_clear(d->old_domain);
cpumask_clear(searched_cpumask);
cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
@@ -132,9 +131,8 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
apic->vector_allocation_domain(cpu, vector_cpumask, mask);
if (cpumask_subset(vector_cpumask, d->domain)) {
- err = 0;
if (cpumask_equal(vector_cpumask, d->domain))
- break;
+ goto success;
/*
* New cpumask using the vector is a proper subset of
* the current in use mask. So cleanup the vector
@@ -145,7 +143,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
d->move_in_progress =
cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
cpumask_and(d->domain, d->domain, vector_cpumask);
- break;
+ goto success;
}
vector = current_vector;
@@ -185,17 +183,13 @@ next:
per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = irq_to_desc(irq);
d->cfg.vector = vector;
cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
- err = 0;
- break;
+ goto success;
}
+ return -ENOSPC;
- if (!err) {
- /* cache destination APIC IDs into cfg->dest_apicid */
- err = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(mask, d->domain,
- &d->cfg.dest_apicid);
- }
-
- return err;
+success:
+ /* cache destination APIC IDs into cfg->dest_apicid */
+ return apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(mask, d->domain, &d->cfg.dest_apicid);
}
static int assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *data,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tglx@linutronix.de are
queue-4.4/x86-irq-validate-that-irq-descriptor-is-still-active.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-outgoing-cpu-from-vector-cleanup-mask.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-get-rid-of-code-duplication.patch
queue-4.4/x86-entry-compat-add-missing-clac-to-entry_int80_32.patch
queue-4.4/tick-nohz-set-the-correct-expiry-when-switching-to-nohz-lowres-mode.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-mxs-add-missing-set_handle_irq.patch
queue-4.4/genirq-validate-action-before-dereferencing-it-in-handle_irq_event_percpu.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-offline-cpus-from-vector-cleanup.patch
queue-4.4/posix-clock-fix-return-code-on-the-poll-method-s-error-path.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-return-path-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/cputime-prevent-32bit-overflow-in-time_to_cputime.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-copy-vectormask-instead-of-an-and-operation.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-irq_force_move_complete-with-irq-descriptor.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-chip-irq_set_affinity-in-proper-context.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-plug-vector-cleanup-race.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-do-not-use-apic_chip_data.old_domain-as-temporary-buffer.patch
queue-4.4/clockevents-tcb_clksrc-prevent-disabling-an-already-disabled-clock.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-search-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-the-cpumask-allocation-from-send_cleanup_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-fix-a-race-in-x86_vector_free_irqs.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-check-vector-allocation-early.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-omap-intc-add-support-for-spurious-irq-handling.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-clear-move_in_progress-before-sending-cleanup-ipi.patch
queue-4.4/x86-mpx-fix-off-by-one-comparison-with-nr_registers.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-atmel-aic-fix-wrong-bit-operation-for-irq-priority.patch
queue-4.4/revert-workqueue-make-sure-delayed-work-run-in-local-cpu.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145687217225194@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.