From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
<jmmahler@gmail.com>, <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
<linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/irq: Reorganize the search in assign_irq_vector" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 22:42:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14568721743394@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/irq: Reorganize the search in assign_irq_vector
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-irq-reorganize-the-search-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 95ffeb4b5baca266e1d0d2bc90f1513e6f419cdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:30:47 +0000
Subject: x86/irq: Reorganize the search in assign_irq_vector
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
commit 95ffeb4b5baca266e1d0d2bc90f1513e6f419cdd upstream.
Split out the code which advances the target cpu for the search so we can
reuse it for the next patch which adds an early validation check for the
vectormask which we get from the apic.
Add comments while at it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.484562040@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -155,14 +155,9 @@ next:
vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + offset;
}
- if (unlikely(current_vector == vector)) {
- cpumask_or(searched_cpumask, searched_cpumask,
- vector_cpumask);
- cpumask_andnot(vector_cpumask, mask, searched_cpumask);
- cpu = cpumask_first_and(vector_cpumask,
- cpu_online_mask);
- continue;
- }
+ /* If the search wrapped around, try the next cpu */
+ if (unlikely(current_vector == vector))
+ goto next_cpu;
if (test_bit(vector, used_vectors))
goto next;
@@ -184,6 +179,19 @@ next:
d->cfg.vector = vector;
cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
goto success;
+
+next_cpu:
+ /*
+ * We exclude the current @vector_cpumask from the requested
+ * @mask and try again with the next online cpu in the
+ * result. We cannot modify @mask, so we use @vector_cpumask
+ * as a temporary buffer here as it will be reassigned when
+ * calling apic->vector_allocation_domain() above.
+ */
+ cpumask_or(searched_cpumask, searched_cpumask, vector_cpumask);
+ cpumask_andnot(vector_cpumask, mask, searched_cpumask);
+ cpu = cpumask_first_and(vector_cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+ continue;
}
return -ENOSPC;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tglx@linutronix.de are
queue-4.4/x86-irq-validate-that-irq-descriptor-is-still-active.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-outgoing-cpu-from-vector-cleanup-mask.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-get-rid-of-code-duplication.patch
queue-4.4/x86-entry-compat-add-missing-clac-to-entry_int80_32.patch
queue-4.4/tick-nohz-set-the-correct-expiry-when-switching-to-nohz-lowres-mode.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-mxs-add-missing-set_handle_irq.patch
queue-4.4/genirq-validate-action-before-dereferencing-it-in-handle_irq_event_percpu.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-offline-cpus-from-vector-cleanup.patch
queue-4.4/posix-clock-fix-return-code-on-the-poll-method-s-error-path.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-return-path-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/cputime-prevent-32bit-overflow-in-time_to_cputime.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-copy-vectormask-instead-of-an-and-operation.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-irq_force_move_complete-with-irq-descriptor.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-chip-irq_set_affinity-in-proper-context.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-plug-vector-cleanup-race.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-do-not-use-apic_chip_data.old_domain-as-temporary-buffer.patch
queue-4.4/clockevents-tcb_clksrc-prevent-disabling-an-already-disabled-clock.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-search-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-the-cpumask-allocation-from-send_cleanup_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-fix-a-race-in-x86_vector_free_irqs.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-check-vector-allocation-early.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-omap-intc-add-support-for-spurious-irq-handling.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-clear-move_in_progress-before-sending-cleanup-ipi.patch
queue-4.4/x86-mpx-fix-off-by-one-comparison-with-nr_registers.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-atmel-aic-fix-wrong-bit-operation-for-irq-priority.patch
queue-4.4/revert-workqueue-make-sure-delayed-work-run-in-local-cpu.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14568721743394@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.