From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
<jmmahler@gmail.com>, <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
<linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/irq: Validate that irq descriptor is still active" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 22:42:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456872175161212@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/irq: Validate that irq descriptor is still active
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-irq-validate-that-irq-descriptor-is-still-active.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 36f34c8c63da3e272fd66f91089228c22d2b6e8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:30:45 +0000
Subject: x86/irq: Validate that irq descriptor is still active
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
commit 36f34c8c63da3e272fd66f91089228c22d2b6e8b upstream.
In fixup_irqs() we unconditionally dereference the irq chip of an irq
descriptor. The descriptor might still be valid, but already cleaned up,
i.e. the chip removed. Add a check for this condition.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.236423282@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index f8062aaf5df9..c0b58dd1ca04 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -470,6 +470,15 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
}
chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
+ /*
+ * The interrupt descriptor might have been cleaned up
+ * already, but it is not yet removed from the radix tree
+ */
+ if (!chip) {
+ raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (!irqd_can_move_in_process_context(data) && chip->irq_mask)
chip->irq_mask(data);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tglx@linutronix.de are
queue-4.4/x86-irq-validate-that-irq-descriptor-is-still-active.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-outgoing-cpu-from-vector-cleanup-mask.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-get-rid-of-code-duplication.patch
queue-4.4/x86-entry-compat-add-missing-clac-to-entry_int80_32.patch
queue-4.4/tick-nohz-set-the-correct-expiry-when-switching-to-nohz-lowres-mode.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-mxs-add-missing-set_handle_irq.patch
queue-4.4/genirq-validate-action-before-dereferencing-it-in-handle_irq_event_percpu.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-offline-cpus-from-vector-cleanup.patch
queue-4.4/posix-clock-fix-return-code-on-the-poll-method-s-error-path.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-return-path-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/cputime-prevent-32bit-overflow-in-time_to_cputime.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-copy-vectormask-instead-of-an-and-operation.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-irq_force_move_complete-with-irq-descriptor.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-call-chip-irq_set_affinity-in-proper-context.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-plug-vector-cleanup-race.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-do-not-use-apic_chip_data.old_domain-as-temporary-buffer.patch
queue-4.4/clockevents-tcb_clksrc-prevent-disabling-an-already-disabled-clock.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-reorganize-the-search-in-assign_irq_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-remove-the-cpumask-allocation-from-send_cleanup_vector.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-fix-a-race-in-x86_vector_free_irqs.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-check-vector-allocation-early.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-omap-intc-add-support-for-spurious-irq-handling.patch
queue-4.4/x86-irq-clear-move_in_progress-before-sending-cleanup-ipi.patch
queue-4.4/x86-mpx-fix-off-by-one-comparison-with-nr_registers.patch
queue-4.4/irqchip-atmel-aic-fix-wrong-bit-operation-for-irq-priority.patch
queue-4.4/revert-workqueue-make-sure-delayed-work-run-in-local-cpu.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456872175161212@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.